Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41269300›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Plaque features for the prediction of in-stent restenosis in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis from a retrospective single-center study.

Tianhao Hu, Runjianya Ling, Xiaoyi Xue, Yajie Tang, Sheng Guo, Yining Tao, Yueqi Zhu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tianhao HuDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Runjianya LingDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoyi XueDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yajie TangDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Sheng GuoDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yining TaoDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yueqi ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. zhuyueqi@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5476-9075

Funding

Artificial Intelligence-Powered Research Paradigm Transformation and Discipline Advancement Plan 2024AIZD018Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities YG2024ZD17New interdisciplinary research Project of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission 2022JC022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis retrospective single-center study evaluates whether high-resolution magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI) plaque features can predict in-stent restenosis (ISR) before stent implantation. MATERIALS AND

methodsConsecutive intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) patients undergoing HR-VWI and endovascular treatment from March 2018 to June 2024 were analyzed. ISR was defined as > 50% stenosis within or near (< 5 mm) the stent and > 20% absolute luminal loss. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent ISR risk factors, developing a prediction model and diagnostic nomogram. ISR-free survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves.

resultsAmong 217 patients (mean age 64.5 ± 10.2 years; 73.2% male), 50 (23.0%) developed ISR within 1 year. Plaque eccentricity (odds ratio (OR), 32.661; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.726-286.334; p = 0.002), higher plaque-to-pituitary stalk contrast ratio (CR) (OR, 2.702; 95% CI: 1.098-6.649; p = 0.03), and lower lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (OR, 0.251; 95% CI: 0.106-0.594; p = 0.002) were independent ISR predictors. The model's AUC was 0.783 (95% CI: 0.683-0.883) for modeling and 0.827 (95% CI: 0.717-0.936) for validation, with a 0.3 cutoff. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed higher 12-month restenosis-free rates for patients with plaque eccentricity < 0.57 (68.5% vs. 27.7%; p < 0.001), CR < 38.22 (76.6% vs. 34.4%; p < 0.001) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio ≥ 3.27 (70.4% vs. 37.6%; p < 0.001).

conclusionsIn symptomatic ICAD patients, ISR was linked to plaque eccentricity, elevated CR on HR-VWI, and reduced lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio. These single-center findings may optimize therapeutic strategies and reduce restenosis risk, though further validation is needed to confirm their generalizability and reliability. KEY POINTS: Question Can clinical and imaging biomarkers predict in-stent restenosis (ISR) in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAD) to guide preprocedural risk stratification? Findings Plaque eccentricity, high plaque-to-pituitary stalk contrast ratio, and low lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio independently predict ISR; our nomogram achieved 75% sensitivity and 82.6% specificity. Clinical relevance Preprocedural ISR prediction enables personalized strategies (e.g., stent optimization, targeted anti-inflammatory therapy), potentially reducing restenosis and stroke recurrence risk in ICAD patients undergoing stenting.

Indexed as

Intracranial ArteriosclerosisMagnetic Resonance AngiographyPlaque, AtheroscleroticStentsAgedConstriction, PathologicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsIn-stent restenosisIntracranial atherosclerotic stenosisPlaque featuresVessel wall imaging

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.