ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Development and validation of a machine learning-based prognostic model for gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and external validation of a prognostic nomogram for cancer-specific survival in elderly patients with early-stage gastric cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Machine learning nomograms for gastric cancer: addressing data limitations in SEER-based models.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMachine learning has emerged as a promising tool for survival prediction in various diseases; however, its application and external validation in real-world gastric cancer populations remain limited.
methodsClinical data of patients diagnosed with gastric cancer between 2000 and 2018 were obtained from the SEER database, supplemented with data from two Chinese medical centers (2005-2018). Three feature selection methods and four modeling algorithms-including Cox, RSF, CoxBoost, and Deepsurv_Cox-were employed to construct prediction models for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Model performance was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), integrated Brier score (IBS), and mean area under the curve (AUC). The two best-performing base models were subsequently integrated into a stacked model and compared against the traditional TNM staging system using decision curve analysis (DCA) and time-dependent ROC curves at 3, 5, and 10 years.
resultsA total of 21,559 patients from the SEER database and 3,805 patients from two Chinese centers were included. In independent testing, the integrated model achieved a C-index/IBS/mean AUC of 0.693/0.158/0.829 for OS and 0.719/0.171/0.819 for CSS. For 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival prediction, the AUCs were 0.705/0.747/0.851 for OS and 0.734/0.779/0.830 for CSS, outperforming the TNM staging system across all metrics. Superior calibration and clinical utility of the integrated model were further confirmed by calibration curves and DCA.
conclusionThe integrated machine learning model outperformed both traditional TNM staging and deep learning approaches, offering improved predictive accuracy for survival outcomes in patients with gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.