ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Global research status and frontiers on autophagy in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): a comprehensive bibliometric and visualized analysis.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis survey aims to carefully evaluate the evolution of autophagy research in TNBC using bibliometric citation analysis to provide a comprehensive evaluation of research results in this field.
methodsResearch on autophagy in TNBC were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WosCC) database. Bibliometric and visual analysis of countries, institutions, authors, journals, and keywords related to the field were conducted using VOS viewer and CiteSpace data analysis software.
resultsA total of 523 papers written by 3908 authors were retrieved, including submissions from 57 countries and 993 institutions, distributed in 230 journals, including 22,756 co-cited references from 2675 journals. It was worth noting that China ranked among the top in terms of publication volume with 235 articles (accounting for 44.9%) and demonstrated the strongest cooperation with the United States. The potential mechanism of autophagy and its impact on the occurrence and development of TNBC, as well as the associated proteins and genes, have attracted great attention. In recent years, research on autophagy and drug resistance has become a key theme and emerging frontier in this field.
conclusionThis is the first bibliometric analysis to describe the knowledge structure and emerging frontiers of autophagy research in TNBC from 2015 to 2024. This study rigorously collates and refines the mainstream research and new insights on autophagy in TNBC. These findings provide a substantial foundation for medical professionals and researchers, as well as promising directions for future research in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.