SynthesisSports medicine - open2025
Sport-related Concussion Can be Prevented by Injury Prevention Program: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective, Controlled Studies.
Synthesis in Sports medicine - open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSport-related concussions (SRCs) have emerged as a global health concern in sports medicine. Effective injury prevention programs have the potential to reduce the risk of SRCs, but, their efficacy remains inconclusive. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of injury prevention programs in preventing SRCs and to examine whether different intervention types (physical- vs. educational-based) and athletic exposure context (practice vs. match) influenced the efficacy of interventions.
methodsSix databases (PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, and Embase databases) were searched in March 2024. Studies were included if (1) the physical training or educational intervention aimed to prevent SRC, (2) the incidence rate (IR) or other outcome data sufficient to calculate the IR for both the intervention and control groups were reported, and (3) the study employed a prospective design.
resultsA total of eight studies were included in the analysis, involving 2571 participants (intervention group: n = 1281; control group: n = 1290). Current injury prevention programs primarily targeted male athletes in rugby, American Football, and soccer. The analysis revealed a significant reduction in SRC rate among athletes who received injury prevention programs (incidence rate ratio = 0.66, 95% CI [0.50-0.85], p = .002). The moderator analysis indicated that neither the type of intervention nor the exposure context significantly influenced the efficacy of the injury prevention programs.
conclusionsSRC prevention programs provided a significant protection effect, reducing injury rates by 34%. Importantly, their efficacy remains consistent across both physical training and educational-based programs, as well as in various exposure contexts. However, further prospective studies are needed to develop injury prevention protocols specifically for females and to investigate factors that may influence the efficacy of these interventions to enhance the prevention of SRC across various sports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.