Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41269694›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Walking Aids and Locomotion Training in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Fernanda Sato Polesel, Sâmia Denadai, Christian Valle Morinaga, Itiana Cardoso Madalena, Marlon Juliano Romero Aliberti, Expedita Angela Henrique, Mario Chueire de Andrade-Junior, Ricardo Aparecido Baptista Nucci, Wellington Pereira Yamaguti, Pedro Kallas Curiati and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05950269 (Walking Aid and Locomotion Knowledge in Emergency Rooms), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05950269 nacompletednot on this map

Walking Aid and Locomotion Knowledge in Emergency Rooms (WALKER 1): Training and Provision of Walking Aids to Promote Autonomy and Mobility of Elderly People in Emergency Care - a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Sirio-LibanesRan2023 to 2024Enrolled153ConditionsMobility LimitationArmsWalking aid, Telemonitoring, Guidance on safe walking and risk of falling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Fernanda Sato PoleselGeriatric Emergency Department Research Group, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sâmia DenadaiGeriatric Emergency Department Research Group, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Christian Valle MorinagaGeriatric Emergency Department Research Group, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Itiana Cardoso MadalenaTeaching and Research Institute, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marlon Juliano Romero AlibertiGeriatric Center for Advanced Medicine, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Expedita Angela HenriqueGeriatric Emergency Department Research Group, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mario Chueire de Andrade-JuniorGeriatric Emergency Department Research Group, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ricardo Aparecido Baptista NucciGeriatric Emergency Department Research Group, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wellington Pereira YamagutiGeriatric Emergency Department Research Group, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro Kallas CuriatiGeriatric Emergency Department Research Group, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renato Fraga RighettiGeriatric Emergency Department Research Group, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Mobility limitations are common in older adults and impact quality of life and social interaction. Walking aids can improve mobility and prevent falls but require oversight and training. Despite being recommended by geriatric emergency department (ED) guidelines, their effectiveness in this setting has not been studied to date. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of training and provision of walking aids, with or without telemonitoring, on mobility, fear of falling, gait, functional capacity, quality of life, cognition, depression, and occurrence of falls in older adults after an ED visit compared with safe ambulation recommendations only. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Geriatric ED of Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil, from July 20 to December 16, 2023, with a 90-day follow-up. Participants were patients 65 years or older who were discharged from the geriatric ED with at least 1 indication for walking aids according to the institutional protocol. Researchers involved in postintervention assessment and statistical analyses were blinded to group allocation. Intervention: Seventy-five participants were allocated to 1 of 3 groups: control, walking aids (WA), or walking aids with telemonitoring (WAT). All participants received safe ambulation recommendations. Intervention groups (WA and WAT) were assessed and trained in device use by a physiotherapist. The WAT group received telemonitoring follow-up to promote adherence. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were improved life-space mobility as assessed by the Life Space Assessment and fear of falling as assessed by the Falls Efficacy Scale International at 90 days follow-up. Secondary outcomes included gait, functional capacity, quality of life, cognition, depression, and occurrence of falls. Results: A total of 75 older adults were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 81.3 [7.7] years; 40 [53.3%] female). At 90 days, the WA group had significant improvement in life-space mobility (mean difference [MD], 12.77; 95% CI, 1.06-24.54; P = .03), fear of falling (MD, -5.60; 95% CI, -9.06 to -2.14; P = .002), and 1-minute sit-to-stand test (MD, 8.45; 95% CI, 4.34-12.56; P = .001) compared with the control group. No significant improvements were observed in any of these outcomes in the WAT group compared with the WA group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, training and provision of walking aids for older adults in the ED improved mobility and fear of falling as long as 90 days after discharge. The addition of telemonitoring did not result in additional benefits. This study highlights the role of a specialized physiotherapy intervention to optimize outcomes in older adults in the ED. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05950269.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalWalkingAccidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overBrazilFemaleHumansMaleMobility LimitationQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID41269694
PMCPMC12639483

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.