Trial reportJAMA network open2025
Walking Aids and Locomotion Training in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05950269 (Walking Aid and Locomotion Knowledge in Emergency Rooms), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Walking Aid and Locomotion Knowledge in Emergency Rooms (WALKER 1): Training and Provision of Walking Aids to Promote Autonomy and Mobility of Elderly People in Emergency Care - a Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Mobility limitations are common in older adults and impact quality of life and social interaction. Walking aids can improve mobility and prevent falls but require oversight and training. Despite being recommended by geriatric emergency department (ED) guidelines, their effectiveness in this setting has not been studied to date. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of training and provision of walking aids, with or without telemonitoring, on mobility, fear of falling, gait, functional capacity, quality of life, cognition, depression, and occurrence of falls in older adults after an ED visit compared with safe ambulation recommendations only. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Geriatric ED of Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil, from July 20 to December 16, 2023, with a 90-day follow-up. Participants were patients 65 years or older who were discharged from the geriatric ED with at least 1 indication for walking aids according to the institutional protocol. Researchers involved in postintervention assessment and statistical analyses were blinded to group allocation. Intervention: Seventy-five participants were allocated to 1 of 3 groups: control, walking aids (WA), or walking aids with telemonitoring (WAT). All participants received safe ambulation recommendations. Intervention groups (WA and WAT) were assessed and trained in device use by a physiotherapist. The WAT group received telemonitoring follow-up to promote adherence. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were improved life-space mobility as assessed by the Life Space Assessment and fear of falling as assessed by the Falls Efficacy Scale International at 90 days follow-up. Secondary outcomes included gait, functional capacity, quality of life, cognition, depression, and occurrence of falls. Results: A total of 75 older adults were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 81.3 [7.7] years; 40 [53.3%] female). At 90 days, the WA group had significant improvement in life-space mobility (mean difference [MD], 12.77; 95% CI, 1.06-24.54; P = .03), fear of falling (MD, -5.60; 95% CI, -9.06 to -2.14; P = .002), and 1-minute sit-to-stand test (MD, 8.45; 95% CI, 4.34-12.56; P = .001) compared with the control group. No significant improvements were observed in any of these outcomes in the WAT group compared with the WA group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, training and provision of walking aids for older adults in the ED improved mobility and fear of falling as long as 90 days after discharge. The addition of telemonitoring did not result in additional benefits. This study highlights the role of a specialized physiotherapy intervention to optimize outcomes in older adults in the ED. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05950269.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.