Trial reportJournal of diabetes investigation2026
Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart biosimilar B01711 vs originator insulin degludec/insulin aspart in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal or premixed insulin: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 study.
Trial report in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo compare the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart biosimilar B01711 (HS-IDegAsp) with originator insulin degludec/insulin aspart-Ryzodeg (NN-IDegAsp) in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who were inadequately controlled on once- or twice-daily (BID) premixed or basal insulin ± oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, active-controlled, phase 3 study, 367 participants with T2DM were randomized 1:1 to receive BID injections of HS-IDegAsp (n = 183) or NN-IDegAsp (n = 184) for 24 weeks. Insulins were administered subcutaneously with breakfast and the main evening meal at the same titration target. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA
resultsAt Week 24, the least squares (LS) mean change in HbA
conclusionsHS-IDegAsp demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to NN-IDegAsp during the 24-week treatment period in Chinese patients with inadequately controlled T2DM previously treated on once- or twice-daily premixed or basal insulin, with or without OADs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.