ArticlePloS one2025
Safety profile of metformin in adolescents with type 2 diabetes: A pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough metformin is the first-line medicine for type 2 diabetes (T2D), its safety profile in adolescents remains poorly understood. This study seeks to investigate the adverse events linked to metformin use in adolescents diagnosed with T2D.
methodsData from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), spanning Q1 2004 to Q2 2024, were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Adverse reactions were standardized using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, then significant adverse drug reaction signals were identified through disproportionality analysis employing reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) methods.
resultsOf 17,956,653 FAERS reports, 80,187 involved metformin, including 973 in adolescents (10-19 years), with 174 cases were identified with a T2D indication. Analysis at the system organ class level revealed that congenital, familial, and genetic disorders [ROR: 8.8 (4.0, 19.3); IC: 2.2 (1.1, 2.9)] and pregnancy conditions [ROR: 4.9 (2.5, 9.5); IC: 1.8 (0.8, 2.5)] showed the most significant signals. At the preferred term (PT) level, three signals were identified across all sexes and subgroups: treatment noncompliance [ROR: overall 4.14 (2.44, 7.02), male 4.27 (2.00, 9.12), and female 4.65 (2.22, 9.74); IC: overall 1.67 (0.88, 2.22), male 1.60 (0.46, 2.36), and female 1.74 (0.60, 2.50)], lactic acidosis [IC: overall 2.99 (1.91, 3.72), male 2.53 (0.76, 3.61), and female 2.76 (1.34, 3.67)], and gastrointestinal disorder [ROR: overall 13.09 (4.73, 36.23), male 54.33 (6.05, 487.96), female 5.34 (1.10, 25.84)]. Neurological disorders were observed only in males, while pregnancy-related adverse effects and renal disorders occurred exclusively in females. Additionally, the study identified potential new signals not documented in metformin labeling, including areflexia, muscle weakness, ataxia, decreased vibratory sense, rhabdomyolysis, substance use, and axillary pain.
conclusionThe study reveals a complex safety profile of metformin in adolescents with T2D, warranting further research to confirm risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.