ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2026
Informing development of brain cancer therapies within "preclinical trials" using ex vivo patient tumors.
Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain and nervous system cancers account for only ∼1.3% of new cancer diagnoses but rank ninth in US cancer mortality, a disparity partly driven by limited therapeutic options and inadequate preclinical models that misrepresent a drug's therapeutic potential. Considering that about 90% of drugs validated with these models fail in late-phase clinical trials, it is imperative to further scrutinize drugs in preclinical settings that better model relevant aspects of disease and treatment response. New paradigms must account for challenges unique to brain cancers such as lack of relevant biomarkers and both intra-disease and patient to patient heterogeneity, which cause treatments to be effective in a suboptimal proportion of the population. In this review, we investigate the current brain cancer drug development landscape, introduce a growing field of functional precision medicine, and propose the inclusion of "preclinical trials" that interrogate the effects of new therapies and drug delivery mechanisms on living patient tumors ex vivo. These preclinical trials respond to the FDA's recent announcement to phase out and replace live animal testing with human-based lab models. Functional models can address heterogeneity and biomarker identification through accrual of living patient tumor tissue, preclinical drug sensitivity testing, identification of non-responders and resistance mechanisms, and development of functional predictive biomarkers and companion diagnostics. Because functional precision medicine stratification of clinical trials candidates has shown improved clinical trials outcome, using this paradigm earlier in drug development could enhance clinical trial success, leading to more FDA-approved drugs and therapeutic options for brain cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.