Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41271017›Full record

ReviewBiomedical journal2026

Lymphedema imaging and AI: A review of diagnostic modalities, biomarkers, and clinical integration.

Bushra Urooj, Sabir Ali, Syed Kumail Hussain Naqvi, Furen Xiao, Po-Cheng Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bushra UroojDepartment of Precision Health and Intelligent Medicine, Graduate School of Advanced Technology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sabir AliDepartment of Electronics and Information Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, South Korea.
Syed Kumail Hussain NaqviGraduate School of Integrated Energy-AI, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, South Korea.
Furen XiaoDepartment of Precision Health and Intelligent Medicine, Graduate School of Advanced Technology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Medical Device and Imaging, National Taiwan University, College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, 10022, Taiwan. Electronic address: fxiao@ntu.edu.tw.
Po-Cheng HuangDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, 10022, Taiwan; Center for Craniofacial Medicine and Morphological Sciences, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address: elifehuang@ntuh.gov.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymphedema, a chronic lymphatic disorder characterized by swelling, fibrosis, and adipose tissue accumulation, requires precise, stage-specific imaging for effective diagnosis and management. This review evaluates conventional imaging modalities, including indocyanine green lymphography (ICG-L), lymphoscintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT), alongside emerging artificial intelligence (AI) applications to enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning. We analyze their capabilities in assessing lymphatic function and tissue changes through quantitative biomarkers, comparing their strengths across disease stages. ICG-L excels in detecting early lymphatic dysfunction, while MRI and CT provide detailed visualization of advanced fibrotic and adipose changes. AI-driven tools, such as automated segmentation and biomarker quantification, show promise in improving tissue characterization and supporting surgical planning. However, clinical integration of AI is hindered by data heterogeneity, lack of interpretability, and regulatory challenges. To address these, we propose a strategic framework incorporating federated learning for privacy-preserving model training, explainable AI for clinical transparency, and standardized imaging protocols. Future efforts should prioritize multicenter validation and harmonized guidelines to enhance reproducibility and ensure equitable, scalable adoption of advanced imaging technologies for lymphedema management worldwide.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBiomarkersDiagnostic ImagingLymphedemaHumansIndocyanine GreenLymphographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiomarkersIndocyanine GreenArtificial intelligenceClinical integrationDeep learningDiagnostic biomarkersLymphedemaMedical imaging segmentation

Identifiers

PMID41271017
PMCPMC13253071

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.