ArticleScientific reports2025
Pomegranate disease diagnosis with severity estimation and treatment remedies using deep learning and RAG-based LLM.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- FedPome: federated deep learning for real-time pomegranate disease classification.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pomegranate cultivation faces significant challenges due to fruit diseases that significantly impact crop yield and farmer income. Traditional methods for disease detection are often slow and prone to errors, delaying timely intervention. This paper proposes a deep learning-based system for automatic, multi-class disease classification in pomegranates using transfer learning. A dataset comprising 5099 annotated images was used to train and evaluate several CNN models, including DenseNet121, EfficientNetB0V2, MobileNetV2, ResNet50, VGG16, and InceptionV3. DenseNet121 emerged as the top performer, achieving an accuracy of 99.35%. To enhance practical value, a novel Healthy-Based Deviation Scoring (HBDS) method was developed to estimate disease severity using Grad-CAM ++ for lesion localization and Mahalanobis distance-based scoring, followed by Gaussian Mixture Model clustering. The severity predictions of the system were verified against manually labeled images, and the system has shown superior accuracy compared to pixel-based methods. Also, a recommendation module was integrated using a retrieval-augmented language model, which provides disease-specific treatment suggestions based on the predicted severity. The complete pipeline is implemented as a user-friendly web application that delivers real-time diagnosis, severity estimation, and actionable treatment plans, which offer a practical and scalable solution for modern precision agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.