Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41271927›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Pomegranate disease diagnosis with severity estimation and treatment remedies using deep learning and RAG-based LLM.

A R Revathi, A Arockia Agash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A R RevathiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology-Chennai, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600127, India. revathi.ar@vit.ac.in.
A Arockia AgashSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology-Chennai, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600127, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pomegranate cultivation faces significant challenges due to fruit diseases that significantly impact crop yield and farmer income. Traditional methods for disease detection are often slow and prone to errors, delaying timely intervention. This paper proposes a deep learning-based system for automatic, multi-class disease classification in pomegranates using transfer learning. A dataset comprising 5099 annotated images was used to train and evaluate several CNN models, including DenseNet121, EfficientNetB0V2, MobileNetV2, ResNet50, VGG16, and InceptionV3. DenseNet121 emerged as the top performer, achieving an accuracy of 99.35%. To enhance practical value, a novel Healthy-Based Deviation Scoring (HBDS) method was developed to estimate disease severity using Grad-CAM ++ for lesion localization and Mahalanobis distance-based scoring, followed by Gaussian Mixture Model clustering. The severity predictions of the system were verified against manually labeled images, and the system has shown superior accuracy compared to pixel-based methods. Also, a recommendation module was integrated using a retrieval-augmented language model, which provides disease-specific treatment suggestions based on the predicted severity. The complete pipeline is implemented as a user-friendly web application that delivers real-time diagnosis, severity estimation, and actionable treatment plans, which offer a practical and scalable solution for modern precision agriculture.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPlant DiseasesPomegranateHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSeverity of Illness IndexConvolutional neural networksGrad-CAM ++Mahalanobis distancePomegranate disease detectionRetrieval-augmented generationTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID41271927
PMCPMC12639151

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.