ArticleThe New phytologist2026
Fine-tuning the buzz: comparing visitation frequency and pollination effectiveness in plant-pollinator networks.
Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ecological network approaches have advanced our understanding of how species interactions influence community and evolutionary dynamics. However, a key limitation is that most network analyses rely solely on visitation data, often overlooking functional aspects of interactions. Here, we combined quantitative (visitation frequency) and qualitative (pollen removal and deposition) components to assess bee interactions with buzz-pollinated flowers in the field. We recorded bee visitation to Chamaecrista (Fabaceae) flowers to represent the quantitative component and conducted single-visit experiments to evaluate qualitative components related to male and female reproductive performances. Data were integrated into ecological networks to explore the structure of plant-pollinator interactions. Across 1838 interactions involving 10 plant species, flower-buzzing bees were the most effective pollen depositors, while robbers removed large amounts of pollen but frequently damaged floral structures. Network analyses revealed that male performance components generated more specialised and modular networks than those based on visitation or female performance, highlighting functional differences among bee groups. While visitation networks offered partial insights, inclusion of pollination effectiveness metrics revealed the importance of specialised vibration behaviours in plant reproductive performance. We emphasise integration of both quantitative and qualitative data to better predict ecological and evolutionary dynamics in specialised pollination systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.