Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41272244›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2026

Fine-tuning the buzz: comparing visitation frequency and pollination effectiveness in plant-pollinator networks.

Lorena B Valadão-Mendes, Pamela C Santana, André R Rech, Vinícius L G Brito, Pietro K Maruyama

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lorena B Valadão-MendesPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ecologia, Conservação e Manejo da Vida Silvestre, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3930-8673
Pamela C SantanaSpACE Group (Speciation, Adaptation and Coevolution), Department of Biology, Biodiversity and Evolution Unit, Lund University, Lund, Skåne, 223 62, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7517-6671
André R RechCentro de Estudos Avançados em Funcionamento de Sistemas Ecológicos e Interações (CAFESIN), Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri UFVJM, Diamantina, MG, 39100-000, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4685-7483
Vinícius L G BritoInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, 38405-240, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-3063
Pietro K MaruyamaCentro de Síntese Ecológica e Conservação, Departamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, ICB, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5492-2324

Funding

Carl Tryggers Foundation for Scientific Research 21:1386Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 300377/2025-8Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 300900/2025-2Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 311665/2022-5Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.691501/2022-00Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-00896-23Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-01151-22Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-01586-24Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-02806-22Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-04689-24Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ1151-23Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais RED-00039-23HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions 101154708Rufford Foundation 2020/30327-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological network approaches have advanced our understanding of how species interactions influence community and evolutionary dynamics. However, a key limitation is that most network analyses rely solely on visitation data, often overlooking functional aspects of interactions. Here, we combined quantitative (visitation frequency) and qualitative (pollen removal and deposition) components to assess bee interactions with buzz-pollinated flowers in the field. We recorded bee visitation to Chamaecrista (Fabaceae) flowers to represent the quantitative component and conducted single-visit experiments to evaluate qualitative components related to male and female reproductive performances. Data were integrated into ecological networks to explore the structure of plant-pollinator interactions. Across 1838 interactions involving 10 plant species, flower-buzzing bees were the most effective pollen depositors, while robbers removed large amounts of pollen but frequently damaged floral structures. Network analyses revealed that male performance components generated more specialised and modular networks than those based on visitation or female performance, highlighting functional differences among bee groups. While visitation networks offered partial insights, inclusion of pollination effectiveness metrics revealed the importance of specialised vibration behaviours in plant reproductive performance. We emphasise integration of both quantitative and qualitative data to better predict ecological and evolutionary dynamics in specialised pollination systems.

Indexed as

PollinationAnimalsBeesFlowersPollenReproductionbeesbuzz‐pollinationCampo RupestreChamaecristapollen flowerspollination

Identifiers

PMID41272244
PMCPMC12825406

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.