SynthesisBMC nephrology2025
Comparative efficacy and safety of finerenone in diabetic kidney disease: a meta-analysis of Asian and non-Asian populations.
Synthesis in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of finerenone on renal function in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
objectiveDiabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a major global burden, especially in Asia. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of finerenone in diabetic kidney disease, comparing outcomes between Asian and non-Asian populations through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
methodsA systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar, and the Undermind AI platform from inception through March 2025. Studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and subgroup analyses that evaluated finerenone in DKD patients. Primary outcomes included a reduction in the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and a decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥40%. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular events, mortality due to kidney failure, hyperkalemia (serum potassium >5.0 mmol/L), treatment discontinuation, hospitalization, and adverse event-related mortality. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) were pooled using a random-effects model, and subgroup analyses were performed by ethnicity.
resultsFive eligible studies, comprising 8,763 participants, were included in this analysis. Finerenone significantly reduced UACR compared with placebo (MD = -0.38, 95% CI -0.42 to -0.35; p < 0.001), with consistent effects across Asian and non-Asian populations (subgroup p = 0.28). It also significantly reduced the risk of eGFR decline ≥40% (MD = -0.24 [-0.40, -0.09]; p = 0.002), with a greater benefit in the Asian subgroup (subgroup p = 0.03). Cardiovascular event risk was also reduced (RR = 0.85 [0.77-0.95]; p = 0.004), while mortality due to kidney failure showed a non-significant reduction (RR = 0.83 [0.64-1.07]; p = 0.15). Hyperkalemia risk was higher with finerenone (RR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.39-2.14), whereas adverse event-related mortality was lower (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.91).
conclusionFinerenone provides robust renoprotective and cardioprotective effects in DKD, with broadly consistent efficacy across Asian and non-Asian populations. A greater renal benefit was observed in Asians for eGFR decline ≥40%, though this requires cautious interpretation. Hyperkalemia risk was increased but largely manageable. These findings support integration into DKD therapy and highlight the need for ethnically inclusive, long-term, real-world trials. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.