ArticleBMC public health2025
Measurement tools to assess the obesogenic environment in neighborhood: a scoping review.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe obesogenic environment encompasses factors that promote overweight and obesity, but few studies integrate both food and physical activity environments with limited details on measurement tools. This study aims to identify measurement tools and methodological approaches used to assess obesogenic environments at the neighborhood level.
methodsWe conducted a scoping review of studies from January 2014 to September 2023. The literature was searched using four primary themes: environment, obesity, physical activity, and food, focusing on studies with measurement tools for evaluating the obesogenic environment from a physical perspective, including Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applications and non-GIS tools such as surveys and audits. Studies in specific population groups and settings such as patients and disadvantaged groups, studies at individual or household levels, and outcomes beyond obesity were excluded. Data were extracted and narratively synthesized, focusing on study characteristics, methodologies, and tools in alignment with the conceptual framework.
resultsSeventy-nine studies were included, predominantly from high-income countries (HICs) (81%), with only one study from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Sixty-four studies were cross-sectional design, with GIS commonly used for measurements (61.0%), followed by combined GIS and other tools (23%), and non-GIS (16%). Accessibility and availability of food and physical activity facilities were mostly identified (49%) such as density or proximity of food or physical activity facilities or calculated using the composite index such as Retail Food Environment Index (RFEI), along with infrastructure for walking, cycling, and transportation as walkability or Walk Score.
conclusionsThis scoping review summarizes tools and methods used to assess obesogenic environments at the neighborhood level. The review points to limited support for GIS tools in LMICs. Combining GIS with surveys and observational audits may help adapt assessment tools across diverse settings. These efforts could inform monitoring and guide actions addressing environmental contributors to non-communicable diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.