ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Comprehensiveness and validity of a multidimensional assessment of patients with fibromyalgia: a prospective cohort study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The value of performance-based tests in the assessment of patients with fibromyalgia: a construct validity and comprehensiveness analysis of a standardized test battery.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFibromyalgia is a complex syndrome affecting all dimensions of biopsychosocial health and quality-of-life. The aim of the study was to quantify the cross-sectional and longitudinal validity of single measurement scales in specific construct domains and to examine how they combine to build a comprehensive, multidimensional outcome assessment of fibromyalgia before and after a standardized interdisciplinary pain program.
methodsThis prospective cohort study assessed 123 patients using 8 measures: the Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI), the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), the Quantification Inventory for Somatoform Syndromes (QUISS), the Fibromyalgia Health Assessment Questionnaire (FHAQ), the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), the Coping Strategy Questionnaire (CSQ), and the 6-Minute Walking Distance (6MWD). The comprehensiveness of the constructs and their overlap were quantified cross-sectionally and longitudinally by bivariate correlations, explorative factor analysis, and effect sizes (ESs).
resultsThe mean age of the participants was 48.6 years (+/-9.8); 86.2% were female. Factor analysis revealed 2 factors with a totally explained variance of 44.5%-64.5%. At the baseline and follow-up cross-sectional analyses, mental health and psychosocial factors loaded more strongly on the first, mental health factor, especially the 4 SCL-90-R scales (factor loads 0.75-0.90) than on the second, predominantly physical function factor. Longitudinally (score differences), the predominantly physical function factor was dominant, with loads of 0.61 (FHAQ), 0.66 (6MWD), and SF-36 and MPI pain (0.68 each). Maximum cross-sectional correlations were up to 0.89 between depression and anxiety, up to 0.87 between pain and interference on the MPI (0.79 longitudinally), and up to 0.83 between depression and catastrophizing. Longitudinally all scales showed improvements. The greatest effects were measured on MPI Pain severity (ES = 0.78) and Interference (0.71).
conclusionsAll 23 health parameters examined had moderate to high factor loads on at least one factor, evidence of the multidimensionality of fibromyalgia. Mental health and function explained the substantial, partially comparable variances of the clinical characteristics. Both domains are almost equally important in describing the syndrome. An accurate description of fibromyalgia requires comprehensive assessment of a broad spectrum of constructs, including fatigue, somatization and coping strategies, particularly catastrophizing, in addition to the traditional pain, function and mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.