ArticleBrain and behavior2025
Psychological Resilience, Symptom Burden, and Supportive Care Needs in Chemotherapy Patients: A Path Analysis.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validity of HINT-8 in evaluating health-related quality of life among cervical cancer patients.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Article
- Psychological Resilience, Symptom Burden, and Supportive Care Needs in Chemotherapy Patients: A Path Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimWhile chemotherapy contributes to the survival of cancer patients, it also leads to various psychological and physiological problems, increasing the need for supportive care. This study aimed to determine the relationship between psychological resilience, chemotherapy symptoms, and supportive care needs in patients undergoing chemotherapy.
methodThis is a descriptive and correlational study. Data were collected using the Descriptive Characteristics Form, the Psychological Resilience Scale (PRS), the Nightingale Symptom Assessment Scale (N-SAS), and the Supportive Care Needs Scale-Short Form (SCNS-SF). Data collection was conducted face-to-face in the chemotherapy unit of a university hospital. Analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 29.0 and Hayes Process Macro V3.4.
resultsA total of 113 patients participated in the study. The mean age of the participants was 56.91 years (SD = 10.917), the mean PRS score was 106.59 (SD = 5.194), the mean N-SAS score was 2.14 (SD = 0.423), and the mean SCNS-SF score was 72.58 (SD = 9.250). The effect of PRS on N-SAS was primarily direct and statistically significant (β = -0.019; p = 0.011). However, the effect of PDÖ on SCNS-SF was not statistically significant (β = 0.017; p = 0.752). Participants generally demonstrated high levels of psychological resilience, a low impact of symptoms on quality of life, and moderate levels of supportive care needs.
conclusionThe psychological resilience levels of the patients were generally high. The impact of symptoms on patients' quality of life was low. While an increase in symptoms negatively affected psychological resilience, the effect of psychological resilience on supportive care needs was limited and indirect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.