ArticleJournal of nephrology2025
Pregnancy after kidney transplantation: global insights based on registry data from three continents.
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pregnancy Outcomes After Belatacept Exposure in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Outcomes and management strategies of pregnancies after heart and lung transplantation across Europe.JHLT open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLack of data regarding pregnancy post-kidney transplantation challenges clinicians who are faced with complex, high-risk cases. Aiming at tackling knowledge gaps and limited cross-cultural data on pregnancy in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), we compared the methodologies and pregnancy outcomes of three registries based in three continents.
methodsData were gathered from reports and publications of the Pregnancy After Renal Transplantation OUTcomes registry (PARTOUT, Netherlands), the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), and the Transplant Pregnancy Registry International (TPRI, United States of America and international). We targeted the similarities and differences among the registries to understand methodological variations.
resultsThe registries utilized distinct approaches regarding data collection which influence data interpretation. PARTOUT conducted a retrospective analysis of all Dutch pregnant KTRs between 1971 and 2017. ANZDATA includes annual surveys on all KTR parenthood events since 1968. TPRI offers international coverage and includes pregnant KTRs voluntarily registered since 1991. Despite methodological differences, preeclampsia, preterm birth and low birth weight were common pregnancy complications, and outcomes were mostly comparable among the registries.
conclusionsDespite differences in case capture, the three registries reported similar pregnancy and newborn outcomes, confirming that pregnancy in KTRs can be successful with careful monitoring across varying populations. Identifying the strengths and weaknesses of each registry can contribute to improved methodologies for global data collection and lower missing data rates. Although managing large databases may be challenging, aligning data across countries could lead to meaningful data pooling, while identifying drivers of outcomes across subpopulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.