ArticleBiological trace element research2026
Comparison of Mineral Levels in Blood and Hair Samples of Healthy Adults: Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Hair Mineral Analysis.
Article in Biological trace element research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immunometabolic Remodeling in Ischemic and Non-Ischemic Heart Failure.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minerals play vital roles in human physiology and immunity. Their tightly regulated levels in the human body can be easily measured in blood, but that only provides a snapshot of the mineral status at the time of collection. In contrast, human hair accumulates minerals over time and is less invasive to collect and store. This pilot study compared mineral levels in blood and scalp hair of generally healthy adults to determine whether hair can accurately detect clinically relevant mineral imbalances and evaluate whether a relationship exists between blood and hair measurements. Minerals tested included calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, copper, zinc, phosphorus, iron, and selenium. Correlation, linear regression, and agreement analyses were performed before and after statistical outlier removal. A total of 30 subjects (mean age: 69.8 years) participated in the study. Most minerals displayed no significant correlation between hair and blood values. However, a weak but significant inverse correlation between blood and hair was identified for phosphorus (p = 0.044 in correlation and linear regression analyses). Linear regression analysis before outlier removal also suggested a significant direct correlation of blood and hair values for zinc (p = 0.0315), but not after outlier removal (p = 0.2682). Agreement between mineral status in blood and hair (low, normal, high, based on established reference ranges) was non-significant for all minerals tested. In conclusion, a significant relationship between blood and hair mineral concentrations was not established. However, the distinct hair mineral analysis results suggest a unique clinical utility for long-term trends and imbalances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.