Observational studyMolecular cancer2025
A machine-learning powered liquid biopsy predicts response to paclitaxel plus ramucirumab in advanced gastric cancer: results from the prospective IVY trial.
Observational study in Molecular cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06490055 (Predicting the Efficacy of Paclitaxel Plus Ramucirumab in Advanced Gastric Cancer.), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Predicting the Efficacy of Paclitaxel Plus Ramucirumab in Advanced Gastric Cancer.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Paclitaxel Nanomedicines: Molecular Mechanisms of Drug Resistance, Tumor Microenvironment-Responsive Delivery, and Translational Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in oncology: linking biological discovery to clinical utility.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- From Tumor Biology to Clinical Perspectives: Novel Biomarkers and Therapeutic Insights in Gastric Cancer.Oncology research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPaclitaxel plus ramucirumab (PTX + RAM) is a widely used second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer, yet no validated biomarkers exist to predict therapeutic response. Identifying non-invasive predictors could enable patient stratification and optimize outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a prospective observational multicenter study (IVY trial; NCT06490055) enrolling 115 patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with PTX + RAM. Serum was collected prior to the initiation of treatment. Small RNA sequencing identified differentially expressed exosomal microRNAs (exo-miRNAs) in patients with controlled disease versus those with progressive disease. Machine learning and logistic regression were employed to construct a predictive model, which was subsequently validated using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in the entire cohort.
resultsTen candidate exo-miRNAs were initially discovered, and a five-miRNA panel (miR-10a-5p, miR-25-5p, miR-125a-5p, miR-139-5p, and miR-450a-5p) was selected via stepwise elimination. This 5-exo-miRNA model achieved high accuracy in distinguishing controlled disease patients from progressive disease patients (AUC = 0.84). When combined with body mass index (BMI), the composite model (EXEMPLAR) demonstrated enhanced predictive performance (AUC = 0.87). High-risk patients exhibited significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS: median, 1.9 vs. 4.2 months, p = 0.019) and overall survival (OS: median, 1.1 vs. 1.7 years, p < 0.001). Decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical benefit of the model. A nomogram was developed to facilitate personalized risk assessment.
conclusionsThis study identifies and validates a novel 5-exo-miRNA panel for predicting response to second-line PTX plus RAM therapy in gastric cancer. The combined exosomal signature and BMI risk model provides a clinically applicable, non-invasive tool for personalized treatment selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.