Evidence mapPaperPMID 41275263Full record

ArticleBMC endocrine disorders2025

Construction and validation of a hypoglycemia risk prediction model for hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients based on machine learning.

Caixia Liu, Zhaoxu Huang, Tuonan Liu, Yangyuan Ge, Jie Yuan, Yue Lin, Chunli Wang, Jinjuan Zhang, Xiaoli Wang, Yan Hua and 1 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC endocrine disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Caixia Liu *Department of Endocrinology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Shaanxi Xi'an, 710032, China.
Zhaoxu Huang *Department of Anesthesiology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Shaanxi Xi'an, 710032, China.
Tuonan LiuNursing Department, The Fourth Military Medical University, Shaanxi Xi'an, 710032, China.
Yangyuan GeDepartment of Endocrinology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Shaanxi Xi'an, 710032, China.
Jie YuanDepartment of Endocrinology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Shaanxi Xi'an, 710032, China.
Yue LinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Shaanxi Xi'an, 710032, China.
Chunli WangDepartment of Endocrinology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Shaanxi Xi'an, 710032, China.
Jinjuan ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Shaanxi Xi'an, 710032, China.
Xiaoli WangDepartment of Endocrinology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Shaanxi Xi'an, 710032, China.
Yan Hua *Nursing Department, The Fourth Military Medical University, Shaanxi Xi'an, 710032, China. huayan1112@126.com.
Rui Qi *Department of Endocrinology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Shaanxi Xi'an, 710032, China. rachelqqi@126.com.

Funding

Research Project of the "Clinical Medicine + X" Research Center of the Air Force Military Medical University LHJJ24HL08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare three machine learning algorithms for constructing a hypoglycemia risk prediction model in hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients, identify the optimal model, and validate it to provide decision-making support for early clinical identification of high-risk patients.

methodsA case-control study design was adopted, retrospectively collecting clinical data from 1,167 hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients in the endocrinology department of a tertiary hospital from January to December 2024. Patients were divided into a hypoglycemia group (220 cases) and a non-hypoglycemia group (947 cases). After screening predictive variables using LASSO regression, the data were randomly split into a training set (934 cases) and a validation set (233 cases) at an 8:2. The training set was used to construct prediction models using Logistic Regression, Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms, with internal validation performed on the validation set to assess predictive performance. The optimal model was determined by comprehensively evaluating the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) and F1 score. The SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) method was applied for interpretability analysis.

resultsThe incidence of hypoglycemia was 18.85% (220/1,167). LASSO regression identified nine key predictive variables: random C-peptide, insulin-containing fluid infusion, BMI, length of hospital stay, age, renal dysfunction, albumin level, lipohypertrophy, and insulin antibodies, all of which were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Validation results showed that the XGBoost model exhibited the best predictive performance in both the training set (AUC = 0.853) and the validation set (AUC = 0.910), outperforming the other models significantly. SHAP analysis revealed the contribution of each feature to the prediction.

conclusionThe prediction model developed with the XGBoost algorithm demonstrated superior discriminative performance, providing a reliable tool for clinical identification of high-risk hypoglycemia in hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2HospitalizationHypoglycemiaMachine LearningAgedAlgorithmsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsCase-Control StudiesClassification AlgorithmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsHospitalized type 2 diabetesHypoglycemiaMachine learningPrediction modelXGBoost algorithm

Identifiers

PMID41275263
PMCPMC12750543

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.