ArticleBMC endocrine disorders2025
Construction and validation of a hypoglycemia risk prediction model for hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients based on machine learning.
Article in BMC endocrine disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable machine learning model for in-hospital hypoglycemia risk in patients with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- A Nomogram Prediction Model and Validation of Hypoglycemia Risk in Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis and Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
- Transforming hypoglycemia prediction in adult type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis for precision care.Open life sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo compare three machine learning algorithms for constructing a hypoglycemia risk prediction model in hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients, identify the optimal model, and validate it to provide decision-making support for early clinical identification of high-risk patients.
methodsA case-control study design was adopted, retrospectively collecting clinical data from 1,167 hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients in the endocrinology department of a tertiary hospital from January to December 2024. Patients were divided into a hypoglycemia group (220 cases) and a non-hypoglycemia group (947 cases). After screening predictive variables using LASSO regression, the data were randomly split into a training set (934 cases) and a validation set (233 cases) at an 8:2. The training set was used to construct prediction models using Logistic Regression, Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms, with internal validation performed on the validation set to assess predictive performance. The optimal model was determined by comprehensively evaluating the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) and F1 score. The SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) method was applied for interpretability analysis.
resultsThe incidence of hypoglycemia was 18.85% (220/1,167). LASSO regression identified nine key predictive variables: random C-peptide, insulin-containing fluid infusion, BMI, length of hospital stay, age, renal dysfunction, albumin level, lipohypertrophy, and insulin antibodies, all of which were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Validation results showed that the XGBoost model exhibited the best predictive performance in both the training set (AUC = 0.853) and the validation set (AUC = 0.910), outperforming the other models significantly. SHAP analysis revealed the contribution of each feature to the prediction.
conclusionThe prediction model developed with the XGBoost algorithm demonstrated superior discriminative performance, providing a reliable tool for clinical identification of high-risk hypoglycemia in hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.