Evidence mapPaperPMID 41275266Full record

ReviewMolecular neurodegeneration2025

Multidomain therapy for Alzheimer's disease: a scoping review of cognitive decline trials.

Jared C Roach, Gwênlyn Glusman, Molly K Rapozo, David A Merrill, Jennifer Bramen, John F Hodes, Prabha Siddarth, Somayeh Meysami, Shannel H K Elhelou, Ryan M Glatt and 7 more

Abstract readScoping ReviewReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurodegeneration, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jared C RoachInstitute for Systems Biology, 401 Terry Ave N, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. jared.roach@isbscience.org.
Gwênlyn GlusmanInstitute for Systems Biology, 401 Terry Ave N, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Molly K RapozoPacific Neuroscience Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
David A MerrillPacific Neuroscience Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Jennifer BramenPacific Neuroscience Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
John F HodesPacific Neuroscience Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Prabha SiddarthPacific Neuroscience Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Somayeh MeysamiPacific Neuroscience Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Shannel H K ElhelouPacific Neuroscience Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Ryan M GlattPacific Neuroscience Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Lance EdensInstitute for Systems Biology, 401 Terry Ave N, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Cory FunkInstitute for Systems Biology, 401 Terry Ave N, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Dan KellyPacific Neuroscience Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
William R ShanklePickup Family Neurosciences Institute, Hoag Hospital, Newport Beach, USA.
Dale BredesenPacific Neuroscience Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Cyrus A RajiDepartments of Radiology and Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Leroy HoodInstitute for Systems Biology, 401 Terry Ave N, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) leading to cognitive decline and dementia results from the interplay of multiple interacting dysfunctional biological systems. These systems can be categorized by domain, such as inflammation, cardiovascular health, proteostasis, or metabolism. Specific causes of AD differ between individuals, but each individual is likely to have causes stemming from multiple domains. Personalized multidomain therapy has been proposed as a standard of care for AD.

objectivesWe sought to enumerate and describe prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for multidomain interventions for AD, and to extract their inclusion criteria, trial design parameters (length, number of participants), and outcome measures. We sought to clarify gaps and opportunities in research and clinical translation.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review using the standardized PRISMA-ScR methodological framework. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We include all cohort studies and RCTs for multidomain (also known as multimodal, multicomponent, multidimensional, or multisystem) therapy of any stage of AD, published for all dates through July 28, 2025.

resultThere have been 23 studies (completed or reported as ongoing) of multidomain interventions for AD, including 19 RCTs. Of the 15 completed RCTs, 12 demonstrate benefit from their intervention in at least one arm.

conclusionsAlthough these RCTs differ widely in their parameters, the majority support the use of multidomain therapy, and show effect sizes greater than reported for unimodal therapies, including pharmaceuticals. Multidomain therapy should be the standard of care for AD. Multidomain interventions (also known as treatments) should be employed widely, early, and first-line. Treatment or prevention is likely to be most effective at early, presymptomatic stages, but is worthwhile at all stages of disease. In order to influence multiple domains, multiple modes of therapy are likely necessary in all patients. Some individual modes, such as particular lifestyle interventions, may target multiple domains. Nevertheless, most patients will benefit from multiple modes of intervention (multimodal intervention) that together target multiple domains. Standard-of-care guidelines should explicitly include multidomain interventions. Future clinical trials must be designed to iteratively improve multidomain therapies. Payors should embrace reimbursement for effective multidomain intervention, including personalized coaching.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAlzheimer’s disease and related disorders (ADRD)Cognitive declineCognitive impairmentCognitive trainingDietExerciseMultidimensionalMultidomainMultimodal interventionsSystems biology

Identifiers

PMID41275266
PMCPMC12751316

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.