Trial reportBMC psychology2025
The effect of solution-focused group counselling on rumination and life satisfaction.
Trial report in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate effect of solution-focused brief group counseling-emphasizing individuals' strengths and future-oriented goals-on reducing rumination and enhancing life satisfaction in mothers of children with special needs. A quasi-experimental design with pre-test, post-test, and 6-month follow-up measurements was employed, including experimental and control groups. Firstly, the Self-Rumination Scale was applied to 110 mothers of children with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities, aged between 30 and 45. Twenty-eight mothers scoring above 27.58 were identified, and 18 eligible participants without major psychiatric disorders who could regularly attend sessions were randomly assigned to the experimental (n = 9) or control group (n = 9). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.The intervention was implemented in six sessions, drawing on the brief and focused structure emphasized by De Shazer and Berg in solution-focused brief therapy. The sessions utilized a comprehensive approach using key techniques, including the miracle question to highlight participants' strengths and goals, scaling questions to monitor progress, and identifying exceptions to identify functional behavioral patterns. No intervention was applied to the control group. Two-Factor Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with Repeated Measures was used to examine group × measurement interaction effects for self-rumination and life satisfaction scores across time. While no immediate significant reduction in self-rumination was observed at post-test, a significant decrease emerged at the 6-month follow-up, showing a significant group × time interaction (F(2, 32) = 5.65, p < .05, η² = 0.261). For life satisfaction, the experimental group demonstrated a significant increase compared to the control group, which was sustained at follow-up (F(2, 32) = 6.924; p < .05, η² = 0.302). Both SRS and LSS scores exhibited large effect sizes according to Cohen's conventions, and the 95% confidence intervals indicated clear and pronounced group differences. The sphericity assumption required for repeated measures ANOVA was examined using Mauchly's test, and Greenhouse-Geisser corrections were applied for the LSS to adjust degrees of freedom where necessary. These findings indicate that solution-focused brief group counseling may have delayed but lasting benefits for reducing rumination, while its effectiveness for enhancing life satisfaction is evident at the post-test and follow-up assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.