Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41275314›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025

A robust classifier for the intrinsic consensus molecular subtypes in colorectal cancer.

Petros Tsantoulis, Yourae Hong, Pratyaksha Wirapati, Ting Pu, Allyson M Peddle, Thomas Mckee, Sabine Tejpar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Petros TsantoulisHôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Service d'oncologie de précision, Geneva, Switzerland. Petros.Tsantoulis@hug.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3613-6682
Yourae HongDepartment of Oncology, Molecular Digestive Oncology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Pratyaksha WirapatiUniversité de Genève, Faculté de Médecine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ting PuDepartment of Oncology, Molecular Digestive Oncology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Allyson M PeddleDepartment of Oncology, Molecular Digestive Oncology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Thomas MckeeHôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Service de Pathologie Clinique, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sabine TejparDepartment of Oncology, Molecular Digestive Oncology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn analysis of colorectal cancer epithelial cells showed two intrinsic subtypes called iCMS2 and iCMS3, in addition to the bulk consensus subtypes (CMS1-4). The intrinsic subtypes can be prognostically important and may prove predictive of response to treatment. We present a method for calculating the iCMS subtypes that is robust to technical variation, is designed for single-sample applications and is highly prognostic in unseen data.

resultsA single-sample classifier (SSC) was developed based on non-parametric correlation similarity with gene expression centroids, synthetically created by resampling samples with known iCMS classes from public datasets that have been used in the derivation of the iCMS classification. We selected the subset of iCMS genes (N = 201) with the strongest epithelial expression in colorectal cancer, aiming to reduce unrelated, non-epithelial variation. The SSC calculates the most likely iCMS class based on the distribution of the classes of the nearest centroids with either an absolute cutoff or K-nearest-neighbors voting. In the unseen GTR cohort, SSC nearest-class accuracy was 88% vs the previously published NTP predictor, which reached 75.4% without correction. Similarly, nearest-class accuracy was 90% in the public E-MTAB-12862. In extended tests simulating various perturbations, calls remained stable with extensive noise, partial gene loss, low purity, and synthetic iCMS2/3 admixtures. In addition, the SSC was applied to data from the VELOUR trial, for which reference iCMS calls were also available. The SSC iCMS was prognostic for OS in iCMS2 vs iCMS3 (p < 0.00001) and performed at least as well as the reference iCMS, which was also prognostic (p = 0.0001). In the E-MTAB-12862 data, the SSC was prognostic in metastatic patients (N = 114), and in a multivariable model including stage, grade, age at diagnosis (all of which were prognostic) and CMS across the full cohort (N = 1062). The previously published NTP was not prognostic in this cohort.

conclusionsThe iCMS-SSC enables robust, single-sample iCMS calling without batch correction, improves resilience to technical/biological perturbations, and retains prognostic signal in clinical-trial data. Its epithelial gene focus and multi-centroid, rank-based design support deployment for screening, stratification, and retrospective biomarker analyses. Computation is significantly faster than NTP and parallel-ready. An open-source R implementation is provided. ( https://github.com/CRCrepository/iCMS.SSC ).

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsConsensusClassification AlgorithmsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansPrognosisCMSColorectal canceriCMSIntrinsic consensus molecular subtypres

Identifiers

PMID41275314
PMCPMC12764145

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.