ArticleMovement ecology2025
Balancing opposing cues: seasonal shifts in push-pull drivers of migration in a temperate waterfowl species.
Article in Movement ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMigration in birds results from a complex interplay of internal and environmental cues that shift across seasons. A push–pull framework conceptualizes migration as driven by external “push” cues, such as deteriorating weather, and internal “pull” cues associated with photoperiod and reproductive readiness. Understanding how these cues interact seasonally can inform predictions about migratory behavior under changing climatic conditions.
methodsWe applied the push–pull framework to assess drivers of seasonal migration in mallards (Anas platyrhynchos), a behaviorally plastic waterfowl species. We analyzed GPS data from 414 individuals tracked across the Mississippi Flyway from 2019 to 2024. Monthly migration direction and distance were modeled as functions of minimum temperature, wind direction, barometric pressure change, and photoperiod. We examined how cue influence varied between autumn and spring migration periods.
resultsBy December 31, ~92% of southward migrations had occurred, with ~50% completed by mid-November. Autumn migration was primarily influenced by environmental push cues—declining temperatures, favorable wind direction, and falling barometric pressure all increased the likelihood and distance of migration. Migration distances peaked in November and December, when these push conditions were strongest. In contrast, spring migration was driven more by internal pull cues. Northward movements initiated in January and intensified through April, with photoperiod overriding weather as the primary driver. Weather still affected migration distances, e.g. warmer minimum temperatures in February increased distances by 62%, while strong north winds in March reduced movement by up to 213%. Barometric pressure had opposing effects by season: falling pressure promoted movement in autumn but inconsistently influenced spring migration.
conclusionsOur findings reveal a seasonal shift in the relative influence of environmental and internal cues on mallard migration. Weather exerts stronger influence during autumn, whereas photoperiod dominates in spring. These results highlight the utility of a push–pull framework for understanding migratory behavior and suggest that climate change may disproportionately disrupt the reliability of migration cues across seasons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.