Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41276492›Full record

ReviewChinese medical journal2026

Data-driven spatial-temporal framework for exploring the heterogeneity and temporality of sepsis.

Yehan Qiu, Xiang Zhou, China Critical Care Clinical Trials Group (CCCCTG) and China National Critical Care Quality Control Center Group (China-NCCQC group)

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chinese medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yehan QiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
Xiang ZhouDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
China Critical Care Clinical Trials Group (CCCCTG) and China National Critical Care Quality Control Center Group (China-NCCQC group)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractSepsis remains a leading cause morbidity and mortality worldwide; effective targeted therapies remain elusive due to its inherent heterogeneity and dynamic temporal evolution. Existing frameworks often focus on either the diverse manifestations of sepsis or its progression over time, but fail to integrate these critical aspects. In this review, we propose a novel spatial-temporal framework that integrates both the heterogeneity and temporality of sepsis. The framework consists of two key dimensions: The cross-sectional (heterogeneity) dimension, which addresses pathogen variability, host factors, and pathogen-host interactions; The longitudinal (temporality) dimension, which explores the dynamic evolution of sepsis and the need for adaptive, real-time interventions. Given the complexity of multidimensional temporal data, big data techniques have the potential to integrate these data and decompose sepsis into distinct disease subtypes. Stratification facilitates the development of personalized therapeutic approaches tailored to specific subtypes. Moreover, methods, such as reinforcement learning, can track the dynamic transitions between these subtypes, enabling real-time adaptation of treatment strategies.

Indexed as

SepsisHumansSpatio-Temporal AnalysisData-drivenHeterogeneitySepsisSpatial–temporal frameworkTemporality

Identifiers

PMID41276492
PMCPMC12768174

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.