Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41277346›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID2025

The Behaviour Support Plan Content Appraisal Tool (BSP-CAT): A New Tool for Assessing and Improving the Quality of Behavioural Support Plans.

Peter Baker, Nick Gore, Suzi Sapiets, Jill Chaplin, Mark Murphy, Ceridwen Evans

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peter BakerTizard Centre, Cornwallis North East, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1421-9639
Nick GoreSchool of Social Policy and Society, Intellectual Disabilities Research Institute (IDRIS), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Suzi SapietsTizard Centre, Cornwallis North East, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Jill ChaplinNorthumberland Community Learning Disability Team, Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Blyth, UK.
Mark MurphyIndependent Chartered Clinical Psychologist.
Ceridwen EvansTizard Centre, Cornwallis North East, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.

Funding

The Sharland Foundation Developmental Disabilities Applied Behavioural Research and Impact Network SF-DDARINUniversity College LondonUniversity of Birmingham
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with intellectual disabilities are at increased risk of presenting behaviours that challenge. Behaviour support plans (BSPs) guide the use of bespoke strategies to maximise life quality and reduce the risk of behaviours that challenge. The behaviour support plan content appraisal tool (BSP-CAT) was developed to assess and improve the quality of BSPs. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability of the BSP-CAT.

methodTest-retest and inter-rater reliability were examined with the assistance of practitioners that supported adults with intellectual disabilities and behaviour that challenges. All participants received prior training and independently used the measure to score BSPs available to them.

resultsParticipants provided 98 BSP-CAT scores for 47 behaviour support plans. Good to moderate reliability was established at the total and strand level.

conclusionsPreliminary analysis suggests the BSP-CAT has encouraging reliability.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyIntellectual DisabilityPsychometricsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultbehaviours that challengebehaviour support plansintellectual disabilityreliability/audit

Identifiers

PMID41277346
PMCPMC12641237

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.