Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41277734›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie2026

Impact of Model Parameterisation and Variance Component Estimates on Genomic Predictions of Carcass Traits in Montana Composite Cattle.

Caroline Assis Almeida, Felipe Eguti de Carvalho, Flávia Cristina Bis, Rachel Santos Bueno Carvalho, Elisângela Chicaroni de Mattos, Rafael Espigolan, Joanir Pereira Eler, Luís Telo da Gama, Fernando Baldi, José Bento Sterman Ferraz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genomic analysis of breed composition and population structure in Montana composite cattle.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Caroline Assis AlmeidaFaculty of Zootechnics and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1892-1081
Felipe Eguti de CarvalhoFaculty of Zootechnics and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7003-6709
Flávia Cristina BisFaculty of Zootechnics and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5026-9778
Rachel Santos Bueno CarvalhoFaculty of Zootechnics and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0555-1480
Elisângela Chicaroni de MattosFaculty of Zootechnics and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6461-6360
Rafael EspigolanFederal University of Santa Maria, Palmeira das Missões, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2586-1643
Joanir Pereira ElerFaculty of Zootechnics and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2939-4798
Luís Telo da GamaUniversity of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3894-3488
Fernando BaldiFaculty of Zootechnics and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4094-2011
José Bento Sterman FerrazFaculty of Zootechnics and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3874-3104

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the influence of variance component (VC) estimates, obtained from different models and two relationship matrices, pedigree-based (BLUP) and genomic information-based (ssGBLUP), on genomic predictions of carcass traits in Montana composite cattle. Phenotypic records from 14,422 animals were analysed for ribeye area, rump fat thickness, backfat thickness and marbling, along with pedigree information from 193,129 animals and genomic data from 3911 animals genotyped with 49,457 SNPs. Variance components and heritability estimates were calculated using restricted maximum likelihood under single-trait linear models. Across five models (M1-M5), fixed effects included contemporary group, embryo transfer, age at ultrasound and cow age at calving, while random effects included direct genetic effect and residual. From model M2 onwards, biological type, heterosis and both combined and specific recombination effects were also considered. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to identify the best-fitting model. Different VC estimates were applied in ssGBLUP predictions to evaluate predictive ability based on accuracy, bias and dispersion. Variance component and heritability estimates were similar between methods, although ssGBLUP yielded higher direct additive genetic variances and heritabilities. More parameterised models using ssGBLUP provided a better fit according to AIC. However, less parameterised models showed superior predictive ability, regardless of whether VCs were estimated by BLUP or ssGBLUP. When comparing predictive ability across sources, pedigree-based VC estimates resulted in more accurate predictions. Thus, the choice of model complexity should be guided by the analysis objective and the available data structure.

Indexed as

GenomicsModels, GeneticAnimalsBreedingCattleFemaleGenotypeMaleMontanaPedigreePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait, Heritableaccuracycrossbred animalsgenetic variancegenomic selection

Identifiers

PMID41277734
PMCPMC13054125

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.