ArticleBioinformatics advances2025
Are the tools fit for purpose? Network inference algorithms evaluated on a simulated lipidomics network.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Node-Adaptive Feature Fusion Network for Drug-Target Interaction Prediction Based on Multi-View Graphs.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Metabolic Regulation of Seasoned White Snakehead Fillets by a Lemon Essential Oil-Rutin-Chitosan Coating Under Controlled Freezing-Point Storage.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Unbiased distance correlation with sample-size-aware confidence bounds for comparative omics network analysis.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Various methods have been proposed to construct metabolic networks from metabolomic data; however, small sample sizes, multiple confounding factors, the presence of indirect interactions as well as randomness in metabolic processes are of major concern. Results: In this study, we benchmark existing algorithms for creating correlation- and regression-based networks of changes in metabolite abundance and evaluate their performance across different sample sizes of a generative model. Using standard interaction-level tests and network-scale analyses based on centrality scores, we assess how well these methods recover represented metabolomic networks. Our findings reveal significant challenges in network inference and result interpretation, even when sample sizes are significant and data are the result of computer modeling of metabolic pathways. Despite these limitations, we demonstrate that correlation-based network inference can, to some extent, discriminate between two different metabolic states in the computational model. This suggests potential utility in distinguishing overarching changes in metabolic processes but not direct pathways in different conditions. Availability and implementation: All relevant data is provided at https://github.com/TheCOBRALab/metabolicRelationships.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.