Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41278007›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2025

Are the tools fit for purpose? Network inference algorithms evaluated on a simulated lipidomics network.

Finn Archinuk, Haley Greenyer, Ulrike Stege, Steffany A L Bennett, Miroslava Cuperlovic-Culf, Hosna Jabbari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Finn ArchinukDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1H9, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4771-7063
Haley GreenyerDepartment of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.
Ulrike StegeDepartment of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9466-7196
Steffany A L BennettNeurolipidomics Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada.
Miroslava Cuperlovic-CulfNeurolipidomics Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada.
Hosna JabbariDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1H9, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7155-2297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Various methods have been proposed to construct metabolic networks from metabolomic data; however, small sample sizes, multiple confounding factors, the presence of indirect interactions as well as randomness in metabolic processes are of major concern. Results: In this study, we benchmark existing algorithms for creating correlation- and regression-based networks of changes in metabolite abundance and evaluate their performance across different sample sizes of a generative model. Using standard interaction-level tests and network-scale analyses based on centrality scores, we assess how well these methods recover represented metabolomic networks. Our findings reveal significant challenges in network inference and result interpretation, even when sample sizes are significant and data are the result of computer modeling of metabolic pathways. Despite these limitations, we demonstrate that correlation-based network inference can, to some extent, discriminate between two different metabolic states in the computational model. This suggests potential utility in distinguishing overarching changes in metabolic processes but not direct pathways in different conditions. Availability and implementation: All relevant data is provided at https://github.com/TheCOBRALab/metabolicRelationships.

Identifiers

PMID41278007
PMCPMC12640239

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.