ArticleAmerican journal of stem cells2025
Safety and efficacy of allogeneic umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in type 2 diabetes: a pilot clinical trial.
Article in American journal of stem cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is characterized by insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction, with chronic inflammation playing a central pathogenic role. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) possess therapeutic potential through immunomodulatory and tissue-reparative properties. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous allogeneic umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UC-MSCs) in patients with T2DM.
methodsEleven adults with T2DM (disease duration ≥ 10 years; HbA1c ≤ 8%) received a single intravenous infusion of 1 × 10
resultsUC-MSC transplantation in patients with T2DM was well tolerated, with only transient fever (36.3%) and mild muscle pain (18.2%) reported. The intervention resulted in significant metabolic improvements, including a 2.1% reduction in HbA1c (P = 0.00095) and a decrease in fasting glucose by 93.7 mg/dL (P = 0.00097). Treatment also modulated inflammatory pathways, as evidenced by upregulating of IKBα (1.76-fold, P = 0.0067) and downregulating of TNFα (0.62-fold) and IL-6 (0.65-fold). Variability in IKBα expression accounted for 48% of the variance in HbA1c (r = -0.69). Two distinct response patterns were observed: improvement in insulin sensitivity (7/11) via NF-κB suppression, and enhancement of β-cell function (3/11).
conclusionAllogeneic UC-MSC transplantation appears safe and significantly improves glycemic control in patients with T2DM. The heterogeneity in patient responses underscores the importance of stratification based on inflammatory status. These findings support UC-MSC therapy as a promising disease-modifying strategy and highlight the need for larger, controlled clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.