ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Could artificial intelligence-powered colonoscopies change the future of colorectal cancer screening?
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence-based computer-aided detection systems for adenomas during colonoscopy: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- The Association of FIT-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening with Earlier Disease Detection: The Romanian Experience.Cancers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, underscoring the importance of early and effective colorectal cancer screening to improve survival rates. Traditional colorectal cancer screening methods include non-invasive tests, such as the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), as well as diagnostic procedures like colonoscopy. Colonoscopy remains the gold standard for detecting and treating precancerous polyps and early-stage cancer, regardless of whether it is used as the first screening test or the second test following a positive FIT. However, its effectiveness can be affected by factors such as operator skill, patient variability, and limited lesion visibility, resulting in a significant rate of missed lesion rates and highlighting the need for more efficient and accurate screening techniques. This review is aimed to assess the current challenges of traditional screening methods with the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in the diagnostic flow. The literature on AI-powered tools for colorectal cancer screening, including novel applications, emerging programs, and recent guidelines, has been reviewed to highlight both the advantages and limitations of implementing this technology in healthcare. Recent advances in AI have introduced soft AI colonoscopy, with the purpose of improving lesion recognition (computer-aided detection) and/or improving optical diagnosis (computer-aided diagnosis). AI-powered colonoscopy systems employ deep learning algorithms to analyze real-time endoscopic images, enhancing detection rates for adenomas, serrated lesions and cancer by reducing human error. AI-assisted colonoscopy enhances adenoma detection, enabling earlier intervention and improved patient outcomes. The benefits are particularly pronounced for less-experienced practitioners, as the detection rates for AI-assisted colonoscopy are similar to experts. AI integration also helps in the teaching process, in developing standardized procedures, and improving screening procedure accuracy and efficiency across different healthcare providers. However, there are challenges and limitations, such as the cost of AI implementation, data privacy concerns, and the need for extensive clinical validation. As AI technology continues to evolve, its transformation of the colorectal cancer screening system could revolutionize the field, making early detection more accessible and reducing mortality, on the condition that the above issues are addressed before widespread use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.