Evidence mapPaperPMID 41278330Full record

ReviewKidney international reports2025

End Point Selection in ADPKD Clinical Trials.

Kitty St Pierre, Ragada El-Damanawi, Julia Jefferis, David W Johnson, Carmel M Hawley, Christine E Staatz, Andrea K Viecelli, Andrew J Mallett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kitty St PierreFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Ragada El-DamanawiSheffield Kidney Institute, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Julia JefferisDepartment of Nephrology, Mater Hospital Brisbane, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
David W JohnsonDepartment of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Carmel M HawleyDepartment of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Christine E StaatzSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Andrea K ViecelliAustralasian Kidney Trials Network, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Andrew J MallettDepartment of Renal Medicine, Townsville Hospital and Health Service, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the leading hereditary cause of kidney failure. Challenges have arisen in developing consensus-based clinical trial end points endorsed by the wider ADPKD research community and regulators. Disease progression in ADPKD occurs slowly and is highly variable between patients. Clinical end points such as death or kidney failure occur infrequently and late in the condition. Thus, their use as outcomes in ADPKD trials requires prolonged follow-up and large sample sizes. Furthermore, because of the nature of ADPKD progression, surrogate outcomes such as change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) or kidney volume, have varying validity in different populations of patients with ADPKD. Alternative trial approaches, such as enriching trial populations with patients at high risk of disease progression, have the potential to mitigate some of these challenges, although they limit the generalizability of results. The emergence of novel trial designs presents potential approaches to alleviate some of these issues. This paper explores some of the unique features of ADPKD from which difficulties in outcome selection arise, examines how modern trial designs can lessen some of these features, and provides an overview of commonly reported outcomes in ADPKD trials.

Indexed as

autosomal dominant polycystic kidney diseaseclinical trialsend pointoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID41278330
PMCPMC12640021

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.