ReviewKidney international reports2025
End Point Selection in ADPKD Clinical Trials.
Review in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the leading hereditary cause of kidney failure. Challenges have arisen in developing consensus-based clinical trial end points endorsed by the wider ADPKD research community and regulators. Disease progression in ADPKD occurs slowly and is highly variable between patients. Clinical end points such as death or kidney failure occur infrequently and late in the condition. Thus, their use as outcomes in ADPKD trials requires prolonged follow-up and large sample sizes. Furthermore, because of the nature of ADPKD progression, surrogate outcomes such as change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) or kidney volume, have varying validity in different populations of patients with ADPKD. Alternative trial approaches, such as enriching trial populations with patients at high risk of disease progression, have the potential to mitigate some of these challenges, although they limit the generalizability of results. The emergence of novel trial designs presents potential approaches to alleviate some of these issues. This paper explores some of the unique features of ADPKD from which difficulties in outcome selection arise, examines how modern trial designs can lessen some of these features, and provides an overview of commonly reported outcomes in ADPKD trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.