ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025
Diagnostic accuracy of AI in chest radiography for pneumonia and lung cancer: A meta-analysis.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chest radiography: an underappreciated source of litigation exposure in emergency radiology.Emergency radiology · 2026Article
- Clinical evaluation of an AI-based pneumonia detection system on chest CT: a qualitative and quantitative analysis.Emergency radiology · 2026Article
- An Adaptive Deep Learning Framework for Multi-Label Chest X-Ray Diagnosis Using a Hybrid CNN-Transformer Architecture and Class-Wise Ensemble Fusion.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Pneumonia: Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction.Current pulmonology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale and Objectives: Chest radiography (CXR) is the most common imaging test worldwide for evaluating pulmonary disease, yet its sensitivity for pneumonia and lung cancer is limited. Artificial intelligence (AI) based image analysis has shown promise to aid radiographic diagnosis. A meta-analysis was performed for AI algorithms evaluation for detecting pneumonia or lung nodules on CXR, and AI performance was compared to human readers. Materials and Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, searched PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and IEEE Xplore (Jan 2017-July 2025) for diagnostic accuracy studies of AI on CXR. Eligible studies included any prospective or retrospective design reporting sensitivity and specificity for AI-based pneumonia or lung nodule detection, with an independent reference standard. Data were extracted using a standardized form and quality was assessed with QUADAS2. Results: Fifteen studies (≈12,000 CXRs) met inclusion criteria; individual AI algorithms achieved sensitivities of ∼70-97 % and specificities of ∼85-95 %. Meta-analysis yielded a pooled sensitivity of 88 % and specificity of 90 % for AI pneumonia detection. For lung nodules, pooled AI sensitivity was ≈ 72 % and specificity ≈ 95 %. One representative deep-learning model for detecting nodules. AI tended to miss very small or central nodules but detected ∼90 % of larger nodules. Crucially, using AI as a second reader improved radiologist performance, increasing sensitivity by approximately 9-10 %age points. Conclusion: AI algorithms demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for pneumonia on CXR and can markedly increase the detection of occult lung nodules when used as a second reader. However, performance varies by lesion characteristics. Overall, AI has strong potential to enhance clinical chest radiograph interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.