ArticleInfectious Disease Modelling2026
Surveillance of infectious diseases spreading on time-varying multiplex networks.
Article in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surveillance of infectious disease transmission is crucial for early detection and timely intervention. Existing studies mainly focus on static single-layer networks, primarily aiming to identify which types of nodes can provide early warning signals and accurate information on infections. Yet, real-world contact patterns are multiplex and time-varying, strongly shaping epidemic dynamics. Here, we propose a modeling framework for disease spread on time-varying multiplex networks and evaluate five node selection strategies: most connected, random, friends of random, most recent contacts, and most frequent contacts by using three metrics: early warning, peak timing, and peak ratio. These strategies are also tested across three scenarios with varying levels of structural information: Aggregated, Single-layer and Coupled networks. Simulation results show that the most connected strategy yields the best results across all metrics and scenarios, but it is costly and often impractical when full network information is unavailable. Importantly, our findings exhibit that the frequent-contact strategy on Coupled networks offers a practical alternative, achieving performance comparable to the most connected approach. Sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of these findings. Our results highlight the importance of accounting for multiplexity and temporal dynamics in surveillance design and provide guidance for effective sentinel placement in epidemic monitoring.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.