ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025
Comparison of protons and very high-energy electrons transmission pencil-beam-scanning for FLASH radiotherapy.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A beam model and Boltzmann solver for radiotherapy treatment planning of superficial brain metastases using a scanned electron beam at ultra-high (FLASH) dose rate.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- New modalities for ultra-high dose rate irradiation and FLASH experiments.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Very High-Energy Electron (VHEE) radiotherapy stands as a promising alternative to proton therapy in view of the FLASH effect, which allows for differential sparing of healthy tissues under ultra-high dose rate irradiation. This study compared the quality of transmission Pencil-Beam-Scanning proton and VHEE treatment plans, with emphasis on dose rate quantification relevant to the assessment of the FLASH effect. Materials and methods: Proton (250 MeV) and VHEE (200 MeV and 150 MeV) treatment plans were designed for four patient cases. Plans were optimized using an in-house developed spot weight and position optimization algorithm. Objectives were set through scorecards based on RTOG protocols. Dose rate estimations were based on beam parameters of the ProBeam system for protons and of a realistic VHEE system. For each structure, a new, model-free FLASH index was calculated. Results: VHEE treatment plans achieved a quality comparable to that of protons. While the conformity and homogeneity were similar, FLASH indices tended to be higher for protons due to higher dose rates covering more healthy tissues. A pulse repetition frequency of 500 Hz was found necessary to attain FLASH-compatible dose rates (≥40 Gy/s). Conclusions: The importance of treatment parameters (such as pulse repetition frequency) for VHEEs to reach ultra-high dose rates was assessed. With their high plan quality, VHEEs could constitute a viable alternative to proton transmission plans and a promising modality for FLASH therapy. The proposed FLASH index offers a robust tool to compare the FLASH potential across treatment modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.