ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Construction and empirical study of China's snow sports evaluation Index system.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to construct a scientifically-grounded evaluation index system for snow sports development in China, addressing persistent challenges in mass participation, industry cultivation, and regional coordination despite competitive achievements. The research was motivated by the transformative impact of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics and the need for a locally adapted evaluation framework that maintains international comparability. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining in-depth interviews with 43 experts analyzed via grounded theory to develop a three-level indicator system (3 primary, 13 secondary, and 54 tertiary indicators). A combined weighting method integrated objective data characteristics and normative design principles, applied to panel data from 2015-2019. Regression analysis was conducted to quantify the impact of Winter Olympics investment. Results: The overall development index increased 10.92-fold from 2015 to 2019 with mass participation showing the most rapid growth (12.71-fold) followed by competitive development (10.64-fold) and economic development (8.82-fold). Regression analysis confirmed that Winter Olympics investment had a significant positive impact ( Discussion: Strategic Olympic investment catalyzed holistic development, particularly in mass participation, amplified by policy campaigns like "Engaging 300 Million People in Ice and Snow Sports." The concentric circle model validated the interconnectedness of competitive, mass, and economic dimensions. However, high operational costs threaten long-term sustainability, necessitating policies to improve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.