ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
3D Hybrid Bioprinting for Complex Multi-Tissue Engineering.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
3D bioprinting has revolutionized tissue engineering, enabling intricate, physiologically relevant constructs unattainable with conventional techniques, yet it remains limited in integrating soft and rigid multifunctional components for complex multi-tissue applications. In this study, we introduce a 3D hybrid bioprinting approach implementing the Hybprinter platform, which integrates multiple 3D printing modules under optimized conditions for a continuous bioprinting process with multiple soft and hard biomaterials. This approach demonstrates robust biocompatibility and broad tissue engineering potential for modeling and therapeutic applications. The capacity to fabricate multi-hydrogel hybrid constructs is illustrated by representative examples highlighting vascularization, multifunctionality, mechanical robustness, and implant suturability. Notably, compared with commonly fabricated hydrogel-only constructs, the resulting hybrid constructs achieve over a 1000-fold increase in mechanical strength, and demonstrated enhanced osteogenic differentiation, underscoring their suitability for load-bearing musculoskeletal and orthopedic tissue engineering. Additionally, cell-laden hydrogel constructs demonstrated robust chondrogenic differentiation, highlighting the capacity for lineage-specific tissue development in vitro. Beyond these outcomes, the presented hybrid bioprinting approach integrates essential tissue engineering attributes that unites mechanical robustness and suturable capacity with multi-material integration, gradient property design, incorporation of bioactive agents, and support for multi-cell loading. This versatile platform advances complex tissue engineering and holds promise for patient specific, organ-on-demand applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.