Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41279939›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Visual Salience Controls the Speed of Evidence Accumulation in Value-Based Decisions by Rats.

Jensen A Palmer, Kevin Chavez Lopez, Mark Laubach

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jensen A Palmer
Kevin Chavez Lopez
Mark Laubach

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of visual discrimination learning decision making in rodents, particularly those using visual cues, can confound the effects of cue salience with reward value, making it difficult to determine which factor guides choice behavior. We addressed this issue using a two-alternative forced-choice task in which rats chose between visual cues associated with high or low sucrose rewards. After initial training with high (16 LEDs) and low (1 LED) luminance cues, we introduced a novel cue of intermediate luminance (4 LEDs) in a "luminance shift" test, keeping the associated reward values constant. We found that while rats maintained a preference for the higher-value option, the introduction of a perceptually more similar cue consistently reduced choice preference and eliminated latency differences compared to baseline. Using drift diffusion modeling, we determined that the luminance shifts primarily caused a reduction in the drift rate (the speed of evidence accumulation), reflecting increased difficulty in cue discrimination. This finding suggests that the visual salience of the options dictates the efficiency of evidence accumulation in value-based decisions. Furthermore, this effect on drift rate is notable because it shows a dissociation from our previous work (Palmer et al., 2024), where prefrontal cortex inactivation specifically affected the decision threshold but not the drift rate. Our results demonstrate that the relative salience of visual stimuli influences deliberation, with low-level perceptual features shaping the computational dynamics of value-based choice. Our findings clarify the distinct contributions of sensory input and prefrontal function in the decision process. Significance Statement: This study reveals that visual perception plays a crucial role in an animal's value-based decisions. We trained rats to make visually guided choices and found that relative differences in the brightness of the stimuli affects how quickly the rats made decisions and how often they chose a higher-value option. Our findings, together with a recent study on the role of the prefrontal cortex in value-guided decisions (Palmer et al., 2024), suggest that separate factors influence choice dynamics in rodents: visual salience affects the speed of deliberation, while prefrontal activity regulates caution. This study helps clarify how sensory and higher cognitive variables relate to the distinct computational components of the decision process.

Identifiers

PMID41279939
PMCPMC12633549

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.