Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280152›Full record

ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2025

Advancing mental health diagnostics: a review on the role of smartphones, wearable devices, and artificial intelligence in depression and anxiety detection.

Huy Hoang, Huong Ha, Hiep Nguyen, Paul Watton, Lua Ngo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huy HoangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, International University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Huong HaSchool of Biomedical Engineering, International University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Hiep NguyenSchool of Biomedical Engineering, International University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Paul WattonDepartment of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Lua NgoSchool of Biomedical Engineering, International University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0001-6039-8557

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of smartphones, wearable devices, and artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized mental health diagnostics, particularly for depression and anxiety, by enabling real-time data collection and early intervention. This review synthesizes the findings from recent studies on the use of these technologies for diagnostic precision and predictive modeling. Following the for Systematic Reviews and Preferred Reporting Items Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted for publications up to April 2025, resulting in the inclusion of 62 relevant studies. Our critical analysis revealed that, while artificial intelligence demonstrates high accuracy in detecting mental health symptoms, its performance is highly context-dependent. We examined significant challenges, including the lack of generalizability owing to disparate datasets, the critical yet often unstandardized role of feature engineering, and the "black box" nature of complex algorithms that hinder clinical trust. Addressing these limitations requires interdisciplinary collaboration, robust ethical and regulatory frameworks (e.g., GDPR and HIPAA), and scalable interpretable solutions. Future research must prioritize long-term validation, inclusivity across diverse populations, and development of explainable AI to bridge the gap between technological potential and clinical reality.

Indexed as

AnxietyArtificial intelligenceDepressionDigital phenotypingMachine learningMental healthWearable devices

Identifiers

PMID41280152
PMCPMC12638488

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.