ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2025
Advancing mental health diagnostics: a review on the role of smartphones, wearable devices, and artificial intelligence in depression and anxiety detection.
Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of smartphones, wearable devices, and artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized mental health diagnostics, particularly for depression and anxiety, by enabling real-time data collection and early intervention. This review synthesizes the findings from recent studies on the use of these technologies for diagnostic precision and predictive modeling. Following the for Systematic Reviews and Preferred Reporting Items Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted for publications up to April 2025, resulting in the inclusion of 62 relevant studies. Our critical analysis revealed that, while artificial intelligence demonstrates high accuracy in detecting mental health symptoms, its performance is highly context-dependent. We examined significant challenges, including the lack of generalizability owing to disparate datasets, the critical yet often unstandardized role of feature engineering, and the "black box" nature of complex algorithms that hinder clinical trust. Addressing these limitations requires interdisciplinary collaboration, robust ethical and regulatory frameworks (e.g., GDPR and HIPAA), and scalable interpretable solutions. Future research must prioritize long-term validation, inclusivity across diverse populations, and development of explainable AI to bridge the gap between technological potential and clinical reality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.