ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Knowledge and Acceptability of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Among Patients, Caregivers, and Health Care Providers in Ethiopia.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Infectious Disease Management in Resource-Limited Settings.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Malnutrition and antimicrobial-resistant infections are major causes of morbidity and mortality in low-income countries. These conditions have been associated with the gut microbiome, although little is known about the acceptability of microbiota therapies such as fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). We explored the acceptability of FMT among health care providers (HCPs) and patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Methods: In this qualitative study, we purposively sampled patients with bacterial infections and acute malnutrition, caregivers, and HCPs at two hospitals. Eight focus group discussions were held. Amharic and English discussion guides covered knowledge of FMT and perceived barriers or facilitators for uptake. Data were transcribed and translated into English when necessary. MAXQDA software was used for a thematic analysis, with trained researchers closely reading transcripts to identify issues, develop a codebook, iteratively code data, and assess intercoder agreement. Description, comparison, and categorization were conducted to discern core themes, and validity checks ensured that findings were grounded in the data. Results: HCPs indicated a general willingness to prescribe FMT, provided that there was sufficient evidence supporting its efficacy and safety and they were confident on patient adherence. Patient acceptability of FMT was categorized along a continuum from those who were unconvinced, persuadable, amenable, and accepting of salvage treatment. Conclusions: FMT may be acceptable for HCPs and patients in Addis Ababa, although interventions are needed to enhance acceptance among some groups, such as marketing it as standard medication, obtaining endorsement by religious leaders, providing multiple formulations, and/or providing thoughtful health communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.