ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2025
The role of the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 in the inhibitory effect of tetrabenazine and valbenazine compared to reserpine on the vesicular release of monoamine transmitters.
Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT-2) plays a vital role in packaging cytosolic monoamine transmitters into axon terminal vesicles, which can be released in response to action potentials. Reserpine (RSP), a classical irreversible inhibitor of the monoamine transporter, is an alkaloid used as an antihypertensive drug. However, its use in medicine was very short-lived because of side effects (depression, Parkinsonism). Tetrabenazine (TBZ) and valbenazine (VBZ), biochemically non-competitive and reversible VMAT-2 inhibitors, are both used in the treatment of Tardive Dyskinesia (TD). The aim of this study was to directly compare the effects of RSP, TBZ, and VBZ on vesicular storage and exocytotic release of monoamines in hippocampal slices, and to clarify whether their actions differ in terms of reversibility and persistence. Our work addresses the biological question of how these clinically relevant VMAT-2 inhibitors modulate monoaminergic neurotransmission at the synaptic level. Materials and methods: Vesicular storage capacity and release of [ Results: In this study, for the first time, direct neurochemical evidence was obtained that RSP reduces the vesicular storage capacity and the exocytotic release of [ Discussion: The difference observed between the two types of VMAT-2 inhibitors might give some explanation of why, in response to TBZ or VBZ treatment, the occurrence of depression or Parkinsonism as side effects is seen very rarely or not at all, and in the case of RSP, it is relatively frequent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.