Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280437›Full record

ArticleGlobal implementation research and applications2025

Embedding Researchers into Local Government Public Health Teams: Exploring Co-Design, Implementation and Evaluation Challenges Through Document and Contextual Analysis.

Dylan Kneale, Rachael C Edwards, Claire Stansfield, Sarah Lester, James Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global implementation research and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dylan KnealeEPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Rachael C EdwardsEPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Claire StansfieldEPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Sarah LesterEPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
James ThomasEPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research suggests that evidence could play a greater role in local public health decision-making than is currently the case. Embedded researchers, located within policy and practice organisations while maintaining affiliations with research organisations, could represent a potential catalyst for bridging the gap between public health evidence generators and evidence users. Evidence examining this potentially transformational model of working is in its infancy. This study explored how the set-up of these roles influences their aims, features of their design, and their expected and observed outcomes, drawing on data from a scheme implemented in 23 Local Authorities (local government) in England. We analysed embedded researcher job descriptions, interviewed stakeholders, examined socio-economic contexts of organisations hosting embedded researchers, and examined publication and funded research data. Our findings indicate diversity in the role specifications, aims, and outputs of embedded researcher positions even within a single scheme. Despite the transformative potential of embedded researchers, challenges such as unrealistic expectations and inadequate evaluation metrics persist. Our analysis suggests that while Local Authorities hosting embedded researchers demonstrated some signs of increased research activity, there was considerable uncertainty as to whether these changes could be directly attributed to an embedded researcher. Co-design of roles between research and practice organisations increases the likelihood that embedded researcher roles were developed with a cogent set of aims, and that these reflect the needs of all organisations involved. The results attest to the complexities of evaluating embedded researcher roles and emphasise the need for tailored, context-sensitive approaches to understanding the contributions of embedded researchers. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43477-025-00179-1.

Indexed as

Document analysisEmbedded researchersEvaluation metricsPublic health decision-making

Identifiers

PMID41280437
PMCPMC12638368

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.