Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41280459›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Loneliness in adolescence: prevalence, developmental contexts, and interventions.

Lily Verity, Lauren Burke, Pamela Qualter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lily VerityManchester Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Lauren BurkeManchester Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Pamela QualterManchester Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loneliness, though often mistaken for social isolation, is a distinct experience that affects individuals across the lifespan and is especially salient during adolescence. This developmental stage involves profound changes in identity, cognition, and social relationships, which can heighten vulnerability to loneliness. Drawing on global research, this paper highlights the widespread prevalence of adolescent loneliness, with variation shaped by cultural and societal factors. We explore how developmental transitions, shifting relational dynamics, and broader social environments contribute to experiences of disconnection, and consider the implications for mental and physical health. Loneliness in adolescence is associated with a range of negative outcomes, including depression, anxiety, social anhedonia, and increased health risks. Importantly, persistent loneliness may become maladaptive, reinforcing withdrawal through negative expectations and creating self-sustaining cycles of social disconnection. The review further examines intervention strategies aimed at reducing loneliness, including those that enhance social and emotional skills, strengthen supportive relationships, and address maladaptive cognitions. We argue that interventions must differentiate between transient and chronic loneliness, reflect the diversity of adolescent experiences, and prioritize co-production with young people to ensure developmental relevance and cultural sensitivity. Recognizing adolescence as a sensitive period for loneliness underscores the need for timely, evidence-based responses that equip young people to navigate disconnection and foster more supportive social environments.

Indexed as

adolescenceidentityinterventionslonelinessmental healthpeer relationshipssocial-emotional learning

Identifiers

PMID41280459
PMCPMC12634571

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.