ArticleHeart rhythm O22025
Utility of short-term heart rate variability metrics in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypertension: a missing piece in HFpEF?Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
- Association Between Barthel Index and Delirium During Hospitalization in Older Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recently, reduced sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity measured by 10-minute electrocardiogram (ECG)-based heart rate (HR) variability (HRV) was associated with heart failure (HF) with recovered ejection fraction (EF) (HFrecEF). However, there are no studies on the optimal ECG recording time to indicate HFrecEF in short-term HRV. Objective: In this study, the optimal ECG intervals and time-domain metrics to elucidate indicators for HFrecEF were investigated in HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). Methods: HRV analyses based on 2-, 4.5-, and 9-minute ECG intervals were performed in 4 groups: patients with persistent HFrEF (n = 40), HFrecEF (n = 41), and stage A HF (n = 73) and healthy controls (n = 40). Results: Mean HR and triangular and SNS indexes were significantly different across all of the 2-, 4.5-, and 9-minute ECG intervals among the 4 groups. In the logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, and mean HR, only the triangular index was significantly associated with recovery across all time intervals, whereas the SNS index at 2- and 9-minute ECG intervals was associated with recovery in EF (all Conclusion: In this study, a higher 2-minute triangular index and a lower 9-minute SNS index indicated functional EF recovery in HFrEF. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the utility of short-term indexes to predict myocardial recovery after HF treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.