Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41281092›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Emerging Therapies for Sickle Cell Disease: From Symptom Management to Curative Gene Therapy.

Max S Duesberg, Gary Schiller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Max S DuesbergInternal Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, USA.
Gary SchillerHematology and Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a hereditary hemoglobinopathy caused by a point mutation in the β-globin gene, leading to the production of hemoglobin S and resulting in chronic hemolytic anemia, vaso-occlusion, and progressive organ damage. Affecting millions globally, with the highest prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa and other low-resource settings, SCD remains a major public health challenge. Current therapies, including hydroxyurea, L-glutamine, crizanlizumab, and transfusions, primarily offer symptomatic relief but do not correct the underlying genetic defect. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only established cure but is limited by donor availability and associated risks. Recent advances in gene therapy have transformed the therapeutic landscape of SCD, offering curative potential through techniques such as lentiviral vector-mediated gene addition and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. These approaches aim to restore normal hemoglobin production or reactivate fetal hemoglobin expression. While clinical trial outcomes are encouraging, with reduced vaso-occlusive crises and transfusion independence, major challenges remain, including high costs, need for myeloablative conditioning, and limited access in high-burden regions. This review explores the evolution of SCD treatment, evaluates the promise and limitations of emerging gene therapies, and highlights the urgent need for equitable access to these transformative technologies.

Indexed as

crispr-cas9-mediated gene editinggene therapyhemoglobinopathieslentiviral vectorssickle cell disease

Identifiers

PMID41281092
PMCPMC12635507

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.