Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41281195›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

Low-Dose CT Imaging Using a Regularization-Enhanced Efficient Diffusion Probabilistic Model.

Qiang Li, Mojtaba Safari, Shansong Wang, Huiqiao Xie, Jie Ding, Tonghe Wang, Xiaofeng Yang

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qiang LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322.
Mojtaba SafariDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322.
Shansong WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322.
Huiqiao XieDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322.
Jie DingDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322.
Tonghe WangDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065.
Xiaofeng YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Translational and Clinical Trial Correlates CoreU54CA274513 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI Timothy An-thy Chan · 2022 to 2026
$9.3M
eXtended Modular ANthropomorphic (XMAN) phantom for Imaging and Treatment Optimization in Radiotherapy.R01EB032680 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI REN, LEI, YANG, XIAOFENG · 2022 to 2025
$2.4M
Real-time Volumetric Imaging for Motion Management and Dose Delivery VerificationR01CA272991 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Zhen Tian, Xiaofeng Yang · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA272991NCI NIH HHS U54 CA274513NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB032680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Low-dose CT (LDCT) imaging reduces patient radiation exposure but introduces elevated noise levels that degrade image quality and undermine downstream clinical tasks such as diagnosis and quantitative analysis. Existing denoising approaches often require extensive diffusion steps that impede real-time clinical applicability. Purpose: To address this challenge, we propose a regularization-enhanced efficient diffusion probabilistic model (RE-EDPM), a rapid and high-fidelity denoising framework that incorporates residual guidance between low dose and full dose CT scans and employs hybrid perceptual and total variation regularization to preserve anatomical fidelity and diagnostic quality. Methods: RE-EDPM incorporates a residual-shifting mechanism into the forward diffusion process to better align the LDCT and FDCT distributions, followed by four reverse diffusion steps using a Swin-based U-Net backbone. A composite loss function combining pixel-level reconstruction, perceptual similarity (LPIPS), and spatially total variation (TV) is used to suppress spatially varying noise while preserving fine structural details. We evaluated RE-EDPM on a public LDCT benchmark dataset across different dose levels and anatomical sites. Quantitative performance was assessed using Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM), Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), and Visual Information Fidelity (VIFp), and RE-EDPM was compared against several state-of-the-art methods. Results: On public LDCT benchmarks at 10% dose for chest and 25% dose for abdomen, RE-EDPM achieved SSIM of 0.879 ± 0.068, PSNR of 31.60 ± 2.52 dB, and VIFp of 0.366 ± 0.121 for chest images, and SSIM of 0.971 ± 0.000, PSNR of 36.69 ± 2.54 dB, and VIFp of 0.510 ± 0.007 for abdominal images. Visualizations of residual and difference maps confirmed superior noise suppression and structural fidelity. Ablation studies and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (p < 0.05) validated the significant contributions of the residual-shifting mechanism and each regularization component. RE-EDPM processes two 512 × 512 slices in approximately 0.25 s (≈ 0.125 s per slice) on modern high-performance hardware, supporting near-real-time clinical application. Conclusions: RE-EDPM offers robust LDCT denoising with minimal inference time, achieving an optimal balance between noise reduction and anatomical preservation. Its efficiency and high performance make it a strong candidate for real-time clinical deployment and for broader applications in transforming low-quality to high-quality medical imaging tasks.

Indexed as

denoisingdiffusion probabilistic modellearned perceptual image patch similarityLow-dose CTperceptual regularizationresidual-shiftingSwin U-Nettotal variation loss

Identifiers

PMID41281195
PMCPMC12636755

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.