ArticleJournal of medical biochemistry2025
Prognostic value of CA15-3, CA125, CEA in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Article in Journal of medical biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and External Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model Using Routine Blood Biomarkers for Differentiating Malignant Breast Nodules.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To explore the prognostic value of cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3), Carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), and carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Methods: The data of 100 patients with breast cancer who received chemotherapy in a hospital from May 2022 to May 2024 were selected. Patients were divided into control and test groups based on different intervention methods and hospital stays. The control group receives routine nursing interventions. The test group implements exercise intervention under planned behaviour planning, with 50 cases in each group. Patients' exercise cognitive score, cancer-related fatigue, and serum tumour marker levels are compared before, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks of intervention. Results: Before the intervention, there was no difference in exercise cognition scores, cancer-related fatigue (CFS) scores, or serum tumour marker levels (P>0.05). After 2 and 4 weeks of intervention, the exercise attitude, exercise values, exercise behaviour control, and exercise motivation in the test group exceeded the control group (P<0.05). The behavioural, sensory, emotional, and cognitive fatigue scores in the test group were below the control group (P<0.05). The CA15-3, CA125, and CEA in the test group were below the control group (P<0.05). Conclusions: Exercise intervention under planned behaviour planning is conducive to improving the cognition of breast cancer chemotherapy patients on exercise knowledge, alleviating body fatigue, and reducing the serum markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.