Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41281468›Full record

ReviewExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy2025

Role of microbiota in the outcome of immune checkpoint inhibition therapy of cancer.

Ger T Rijkers, Yonah Langcauon, Pippe van Leersum, Lara Popović, Frans J van Overveld

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ger T RijkersDepartment of Health, Cognition, and Behavior, University College Roosevelt, Middelburg 4330 CB, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5928-9545
Yonah LangcauonDepartment of Health, Cognition, and Behavior, University College Roosevelt, Middelburg 4330 CB, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0488-4660
Pippe van LeersumDepartment of Health, Cognition, and Behavior, University College Roosevelt, Middelburg 4330 CB, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6962-9011
Lara PopovićDepartment of Health, Cognition, and Behavior, University College Roosevelt, Middelburg 4330 CB, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0950-347X
Frans J van OverveldDepartment of Health, Cognition, and Behavior, University College Roosevelt, Middelburg 4330 CB, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0352-9113

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The realization that the composition and functionality of gut microbiota have an impact on the outcome of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) therapy of cancer has initiated research into the potential of microbiota management as adjunctive therapy. Fecal microbiota transplantation can improve the outcome of ICI, but for optimal donor selection, safety, and large-scale implementation, there remain bottlenecks. Alternative strategies, such as the use of selected bacterial species, require fundamental knowledge of the underlying mechanisms governing the interaction between (intestinal) microbiota and the immune system. Gut microbiota also appears to be able to colonize the tumor microenvironment. Some bacterial species directly or indirectly promote tumor growth. Other defined species have tumoricidal properties. These findings and insights are now being used to further optimize the functionality of the immune system and shape the tumor microenvironment in order to improve the outcome of ICI.

Indexed as

gut microbiotaimmune checkpoint inhibition therapyregulatory T cellstumor residing bacteria

Identifiers

PMID41281468
PMCPMC12635439

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.