Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41281523›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of psychiatry2025

Potential role of meningeal lymphatic drainage in repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced cognitive improvement: A call for further research.

Ying-Pei Li, Yin Niu, Hong Ding, Zhi Chen, Qiang Zhang

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ying-Pei LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China.
Yin NiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China.
Hong DingDepartment of Neurosurgery, The 961st Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Qiqihar 161000, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Zhi ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China.
Qiang ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The 961st Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Qiqihar 161000, Heilongjiang Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI), which is a high-risk transitional phase leading to Alzheimer's disease, is characterized by mild memory deficits and specific cognitive dysfunctions. Without effective intervention, a significant proportion of patients with MCI progress to dementia. However, current pharmacological treatments are characterized by side effects and poor patient compliance. Therefore, it is necessary to develop effective, noninvasive alternative treatments. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is becoming a widely studied noninvasive treatment for central nervous system disease. The therapeutic effects of rTMS on patients with MCI and its underlying mechanism are noteworthy issues. Recently, a growing number of studies have shown that meningeal lymphatic vessel damage may be related to cognitive dysfunction. Whether the improvement of the meningeal lymphatic system is an important mechanism through which rTMS improves the clinical manifestations of MCI is worthy of further study.

Indexed as

Cognitive functionMemory functionMeningeal lymphatic systemMild cognitive impairmentRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41281523
PMCPMC12635702

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.