Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41281567›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025

Wearable neurotechnology systems for upper extremity rehabilitation in children with cerebral palsy: a scoping review.

Sara Jo Burchfield, Angela Shierk, Cindy Truong, Regan Blankenship

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara Jo BurchfieldDepartment of Occupational Therapy, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
Angela ShierkDepartment of Clinical Research, Scottish Rite for Children, Dallas, TX, United States.
Cindy TruongDepartment of Occupational Therapy, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
Regan BlankenshipDepartment of Occupational Therapy, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Children with cerebral palsy often experience persistent upper extremity impairments that impact independence and participation in daily activities. Wearable neurotechnology devices offer a promising, non-invasive approach to enhance motor control, promote neuroplasticity, and extend neurorehabilitation beyond clinical settings. However, the development and application of such devices in pediatric populations remains poorly defined. This scoping review aimed to map the existing literature on wearable neurotechnology systems used for upper extremity rehabilitation in children with cerebral palsy and identify knowledge gaps to guide future research and clinical translation in pediatric neurorehabilitation. Methods: This review followed the JBI Scoping Review Methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Four electronic database sources, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO, were systematically searched to identify studies on wearable neurotechnology devices for upper extremity rehabilitation in children with cerebral palsy. Included studies consisted of journal articles published from January 2005 to June 2025, with full texts available in English and relevant gray literature sources. Data were extracted on neurotechnology characteristics, regulatory status, intervention protocols, and outcome measures. Results: From the 2,892 articles screened, 21 met the eligibility criteria. Most devices were in early developmental stages, with only five receiving regulatory approval. Studies examined various systems, including electromyography-triggered stimulation, virtual reality, and robot-assisted devices with haptic or electrical stimulation, and wearable garments embedded with electrical or vibrotactile stimulators. Intervention protocols varied widely across studies in terms of treatment intensity, wear schedules, and co-interventions. Feasibility was generally positive across studies, with high adherence rates and minimal adverse events reported. Many studies reported improvements in motor outcomes, including enhanced grip strength, hand use, range of motion, grasp and release ability, and muscular recruitment. Conclusions: Wearable neurotechnology shows potential to augment upper extremity rehabilitation in children with cerebral palsy, particularly through systems that support task-specific, feedback-driven practice. However, translation to clinical practice is limited by heterogeneity in device design, lack of standardized protocols, and limited high-quality evidence. Future research should prioritize standardization, clinician-centered implementation studies, and long-term outcomes to support integration into pediatric care. Systematic review registration: https://osf.io/5qxpe.

Indexed as

cerebral palsyneurorehabilitationoccupational therapypediatricsupper extremity rehabilitationwearable neurotechnology

Identifiers

PMID41281567
PMCPMC12635914

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.