ArticleJournal of public health research2025
Ethical considerations for conducting research with transgender and gender-diverse patient registries: Balancing our need for evidence with patient vulnerability.
Article in Journal of public health research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most, if not all, medical centers have patient registries for quality improvement/quality assurance projects and patient outcome data, which can also be used to conduct population health studies through secondary research. Such registries offer significant public health benefits, such as facilitating better care, guiding resource allocation, and improving patient outcomes. Because patient registries promise possibilities for collecting patient outcome and longitudinal cohort data, researchers in transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) health have advocated for the creation of patient registries to increase the evidence base for the efficacy of gender-affirming care and population health outcomes. However, there is an absence in the literature on the ethical dimensions of creating and using these registries for research. Existing TGD patient registries were likely developed during the Biden administration, a period of expanding legally protections and social acceptance before the current wave of widespread political attacks on TGD healthcare. Using the same patient registries for research now presents different ethical challenges than when they were initially developed. This discussion provides recommendations for conducting ethical research, ultimately advocating for the creation of TGD patient registries in which participants are fully aware of how their data will be used and stored with robust mechanisms in place to ensure confidentiality and security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.