SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Efficacy and safety of oral ivermectin versus benzyl benzoate for the treatment of scabies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated in vitro and in vivo evaluation of ivermectin hydrogel formulation for management of scabies with pharmacological assessment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Elucidating adverse drug reactions and underlying molecular mechanisms of ivermectin through pharmacovigilance and multi-omics analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Scabies Treatment Failure: Beyond Drug Resistance and Toward a Multidimensional Understanding.Journal of tropical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/objectives: Oral ivermectin and topical benzyl benzoate are two common treatment options for scabies, but there is ongoing discussion regarding their relative safety and efficacy. A thorough synthesis of the available evidence is required to inform treatment decisions because of the clinical debate caused by the contradictory findings from current randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on evidence retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL for RCTs up to August 2025. The primary outcome was the cure rate. Secondary outcomes included pruritus improvement and the incidence of adverse events. Stata MP v. 18 was used to pool outcomes. Results: Ten RCTs involving 1,105 patients were included. Cure rates showed no significant difference between ivermectin and benzyl benzoate at 1 week (RR: 1.07, 95% CI [0.88, 1.30], Conclusion: Oral ivermectin and topical benzyl benzoate exhibit comparable efficacy for the treatment of scabies. However, ivermectin's significantly better safety and tolerability, combined with the practical advantage of oral administration, establish it as a valuable and often preferable therapeutic choice. Systematic review registration: CRD420251143937.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.